[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-245) Promote the right way how extensions should communicate with each other during container initialization

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Mark Struberg commented on CDI-245: ----------------------------------- au contraire! Extensions are exactly defined as @ApplicationScoped @Default beans in CDI-1.0: {quote} An extension is a service provider of the service javax.enterprise.inject.spi.Extension declared in META-INF/services. ... For each service provider, the container must provide a bean of scope @ApplicationScoped and qualifier @Default, {quote} I'm also not sure if the re-wording is clear enough. You changed: - If other beans are injected into service providers + If other beans are injected into an extension's observer methods But this leaves out direct injection into CDI-Extensions {code} public class BrokenExtension implements Extension { private @Inject OtherExtension notAllowed; private @Inject BeanManager holymolyIsThisAllowedQuestionmark; } {code} The question whether the direct injection of a BeanManager into an Extension is ok for CDI-1.0 remains. Not that I think this is supported by neither Weld nor OWB... ;) I also completely miss the change where you define firing CDI lifecycle events as non-portable. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira