[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Mark Struberg commented on CDI-132:
-----------------------------------
things get more complicated.
I think the current AnnotatedType maintains no 'relation' to it's parent
class. Instead it contains the 'effective' model only. But this is imo not enough.
It also doesn't say anything about modifiers public/protected/private.
What should the AnnotatedType of the following class provide?:
@ApplicationScoped
public class MyBaseSvc {
private @Inject EntityManager;
...
}
@ApplicationScoped
public class DongService extends MyBaseSvc {
...
}
Clarify which initial info AnnotatedType should contain
-------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-132
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-132
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Components: Portable Extensions
Reporter: Mark Struberg
Assignee: Pete Muir
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.1.EDR1
The spec is not exactly clear about the initial content of AnnotatedType.
When initially building the AnnotatedType (e.g. before handing it over to the Extensions)
we need to pre-fill them with the info from the annotations from the classes.
Should this AnnotatedType:
1.) contain no annotations from superclasses?
2.) contain all annotations from superclasses?
3.) contain @Inherited annotations from superclasses?
I think the other questions already got cleared up in CDI-70:
Should AnnotatedType contain derived public? protected? private? methods/fields from a
superclass?
Imo it should contain all information which would be available by manually parsing any
annotations. In other words: it should be possible to completely modify or emulate
annotations of a parsed type.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira