[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
John Ament commented on CDI-624:
--------------------------------
These methods must have snuck in. I was pushing hard against the idea of mixing container
init and lifecycle in SE. I would prefer the dynamic extension approach, if anything were
to be followed.
Map SeContainerInitializer.addBeans() and
SeContainerInitializer.addAnnotatedTypes() to the application initialization lifecycle
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-624
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-624
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Clarification
Components: Java SE Integration
Affects Versions: 2.0-EDR2
Reporter: Martin Kouba
I believe we should not break the application initialization lifecycle.
So it might be reasonable to state that {{SeContainerInitializer.addAnnotatedTypes()}}
maps to {{AfterTypeDiscovery.addAnnotatedType(AnnotatedType<?>, String)}} (note that
we would have to sort out missing id) and {{SeContainerInitializer.addBeans()}} maps to
{{AfterBeanDiscovery.addBean(Bean<?>)}}.
The other solution would be to remove these methods and introduce the concept of
"synthetic container lifecycle event observers" and leverage the configurators
API. See also
http://weld.cdi-spec.org/news/2016/02/08/weld-se-synth-lifecycle-events/.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)