Well, it's true that the API does not have any dependency on common-annotations.
But strictly speaking the CDI 2.0 Specification _does_ require common-annotations-1.3 for
@Priority on @Observes parameters.
Should we have pointed this out in the spec pdf?
We might add it as errata...
LieGrue,
strub
Am 02.06.2017 um 07:57 schrieb Tomas Remes
<tremes(a)redhat.com>:
Hi Laird,
I think CDI API doesn't require this dependency, but Weld 3 needs JSR 250 dependency
with 1.3 version.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laird Nelson" <ljnelson(a)gmail.com>
To: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 7:09:28 PM
Subject: [cdi-dev] JSR 250 version?
I'm sure I missed something somewhere, but what version of JSR 250 (Common
Annotations for the Java™ Platform™) does CDI 2.0 require? I assume it's 1.3, but I
didn't see any reference to this annotations specification in the CDI specification.
Thanks,
Best,
Laird
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.