[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Matej Novotny edited comment on CDI-703 at 6/1/17 4:28 AM: ----------------------------------------------------------- It's not my assumption, that's how transitive relation works by definition. As for {{@Named}} this is clear too, just look few lines below that, where the spec says: bq. If Y has a bean name and X declares a bean name explicitly the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error. Again, apply substitution and you have a result -> definition error if both have {{@Named}}. was (Author: manovotn): It's not my assumption, that's how transitive relation works by definition. As for {{@Named}} this is clear too, just look few lines below that, where the spec says: bq. If Y has a bean name and X declares a bean name explicitly the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error. Again, apply transitive relation rules and you have a result -> definition error if both have {{@Named}}. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)