]
Mark Struberg commented on CDI-414:
-----------------------------------
[~atijms] Ok, I thought your EJB code was only an example about how it works within pure
EJBs.
Of course @Inject in @Stateless beans should work the same way as @EJB. It actually should
really make no difference if you resolve the EJB via @Inject, @EJB or manually from JNDI.
If this doesn't work it is a bug imo.
But this most likely has nothing to do with Weld but more with the integration in the EJB
container. What JavaEE server did you have this problem with?
Support for "self" injection
----------------------------
Key: CDI-414
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-414
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Resolution
Reporter: arjan tijms
Many features of CDI and EJB work by means of a proxy that intercepts calls and adds
'aspects'. In Java it's however not possible to decorate the {{this}} pointer,
so methods called on the same bean instance from within a method in the bean do not get
their 'aspects' applied.
This is a well known limitation, but in EJB it's possible to work around this by
injecting a bean into itself. E.g.
{code}
@Stateless
public class Foo {
@EJB
private Foo self;
// ...
}
{code}
Also see
http://adam-bien.com/roller/abien/entry/how_to_self_invoke_ejb
Unfortunately using CDI and {{@Inject}} this doesn't work. Weld for instance fails
the deployment and logs:
{noformat}
WELD-001443 Pseudo scoped bean has circular dependencies.
{noformat}
See also:
http://adam-bien.com/roller/abien/entry/inject_vs_ejb
Although there are workarounds, it would be great if {{@Inject}} in combination with CDI
could support self injection as well.
With that projects migrating from {{@EJB}} to {{@Inject}} can do so more easily and the
capability can be convenient for new projects as well (e.g. calling two separate
{{@Transactional}} methods from a single method without being required to create a new
bean).