Re: [cdi-dev] Ordering of AfterTypeDiscovery#getAlternatives() et al

On 12/20/2014 11:26 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi! > > If I have a > > > @Priority(100) > public class MyAlternative implements Foo .. > > and > > > @Priority(101) > public class ABetterAlternative implements Foo .. > > > Then ABetterAlternative will finally be chosen. > > This ordering can be changed via AfterTypeDiscovery#getAlternatives(). > > But the spec only says "returns the ordered list of enabled alternatives for the application.." > > But it does NOT define in which sorting this list is ordered ;) > > In OWB we hat the 'most important' alternative come first. It seems in Weld it is the other way around. What sorting do you use for interceptors and decorators? >

> I have no problem with changing this in OWB, but I would like to get this clarified in our JavaDocs and spec. Agreed. Go ahead and file an issue. > > LieGrue, > strub > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.