They basically are in chronological order, but in two groupings:
* Group 1: Global lifecycle events - those that are fired once
* Group 2: Discovery events - those that are fired once per thing processed
I’m not sure interleaving them would really make things clearer. It would be better to
describe the ordering as is.
On 3 Apr 2014, at 09:30, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net> wrote:
Hi all,
Why the lifecycle events described in 11.5 are not introduced in their chronological
order? And what is the order logic here, because I’d like to at least stress that there
are not described in their actual sequence.
Antoine