Actually, the example is in the spec itself (same section, a few rows
below).
On 2.4.2012 11:38, Pete Muir wrote:
Working on the assumption that in your example User extends
Persistent, then Dao<T extends Persistent> isn't assignable to Dao<User>
generally, so this change is correct, surely?
On 1 Apr 2012, at 15:12, Marko Lukša wrote:
> Hey
>
> How come section 5.2.3., bullet 4 was changed from:
> • the required type parameter is an actual type, the bean type parameter is a type
variable and the actual type is assignable to the upper bound, if any, of the type
variable...
> to:
> • the required type parameter is an actual type, the bean type parameter is a type
variable and the actual type is assignable from the upper bound, if any, of the type
variable...
> Doesn't this mean bean Dao<T extends Persistent> will not be assignable to
Dao<User>?
> M.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev