Re: [cdi-dev] Contexts behavior in SE and Async Event for EDR1

Le 18 juin 2015 à 20:37, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt; a écrit : 1.) The whole point is that @RequestScoped is NOT a web context! Otherwise it would _not_ be active in JMS etc… And that was not an accident but intentional. 2.) And no, different async threads will _never_ get the same request context… 3.) no @RequestScoped is a sub-part of a @ThreadScoped. Otherwise you would get the same context for 2 JMS invocations which get (randomly) executed on the same worker thread. Got me? LieGrue, strub > Am 18.06.2015 um 15:13 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com&gt;: > > Hi > > I wouldn't activate any "web" scope by default, in particular for async events where I think most of the time it will not be used. Next feature request will be to inherit the scope between async threads....and here I guess we agree it will not go very far. > > Side note: using request scope where actually a thread scope is needed is a pain, maybe time to add a thread scoped with an accessible manual activation. Would make "batches", "timers" etc easy to impl/integrate. > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber > > 2015-06-18 15:10 GMT+02:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt;: > Hi guys, > > We should finally decide how to manage normal scope context (other than application context ) in SE and during Async Event for EDR1. > > Having only RequestContext active during async event as Martin suggest in the PR makes sense and would be consistent with its behavior during async EJB call. > > Mark asked twice to activate Request Context all the time in SE (making it a new Application Context). I’m not found of it, but I’ml not the only one to decide here. > > What is you feeling about this ? > > Antoine > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.