Re: [cdi-dev] prd review

On 3 Nov 2012, at 07:40, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi folks! > > I think there are still a few paragraphs in there which I personally thought we already dropped again > > I gonna review the spec page by page the next 2 weeks. > > in 'Foreward' (btw shouldn't that be 'Foreword'?) Ooops ;-) Please file a JIRA.

> > * "Ability to veto beans declaratively using @Veto and @Requires" > I thought we dropped @Requires as it's not really possible to implement that properly? That would require any scanning mechanism to know CDI and it's mechanics. > At least this references to a valid paragraph ;) -> should get fixed too. > > > * "Ability to access the BeanManager from the ServletContext" > Didn't we drop that as well? I wasnt able to find the definition in the rest of the spec. Both of these I missed removing from the 1.0 -> EDR list. Again, JIRA it. > > * "Ability to obtain Extension instances from BeanManager" > As above, do we really have this now? Thought we dont need it as its perfectly possible to @Inject Extensions since CDI-1.0 This is still in. Please file a JIRA. > > > Foreword misses a reference to CDI-18 which is imo the most important change. This is there - • Global ordering and enablement of interceptors and decorators • Global selection of alternatives > > > > > Just for the start :) > > LieGrue, > strub > > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev