Hi John
most, if not all Java 8 lambda types are not serializable afaik (sure, one can specify
custom serializable lambdas, but I guess this happens rather rarely), so assigning a
lambda typed bean a serializable context will probably always cause problems. Even the
lamda type itself is serializable, it does not mean it's closure is. Even though
application scoped lambda beans are in general no problem at all, most other contexts are.
So the question is, whether to allow lambda typed bean to have any serializable scope at
all.
Don't get me wrong. I am a huge fan of Java 8 and functional programming in general,
but I think FP's way of expressive design somehow collides with CDI's rather
declarative style. At least for non-SPI code.
Best regards
Sven
-- sent by phone
Am 17.10.2015 um 15:03 schrieb John D. Ament
<john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>:
Sven,
I'm a little curious, why do they need to avoid serializable contexts? In all
honesty, I use app scoped functions, predicates in my code, at least in a couple of
places. Lambdas are specifically meant for operations, not data, so they should be in a
highly reusable scope (in my opinion at least).
On the flip side, I have a hard time justifying needing to provide injectable beans for
lambdas since good encapsulation should indicate they're only used in a single spot.
John
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 7:51 AM Sven Linstaedt <sven.linstaedt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Just one question: Who is on charge and is able of managing this unmanaged instances,
e.g. lifecycle, serialization, concurrency (e.g. when dealing with closures)?
>
> Functional programming and DI seem to be somehow disjunct in this case. E.g. manually
setting up observers seem to better fit extension than normal application code.
>
> On the other side, specifying producer methods or fields, that are injectable and
return lambda expressions seems to be a no brainier for CDI, is not it? As long as they
are not scoped in a serializable context.
>
> Have a nice weekend
> Sven
>
> -- sent by phone
>
>> Am 17.10.2015 um 11:06 schrieb David Blevins <david.blevins(a)gmail.com>:
>>
>> In brainstorming mode about fun that could be made possible with Java 8 and Java
EE.
>>
>> Question in my mind is: is there some way we could make it possible for Lambdas
or Method Refs to be CDI beans?
>>
>> It goes against the grain obviously as CDI creation is very much a “Don’t call
us, we’ll call you” kind of thing. The VM dynamically creates a wrapper object around the
Lambda or method reference and it implements the given interface.
>>
>> To make it work, there would need to be some non-producer method way of saying
“put this thing in the context with these qualifiers”.
>>
>> Imagine a method somewhere that would allow you to:
>>
>> public <T> void addObserver(java.util.function.Consumer<T>
observer, Annotation... qualifiers);
>>
>>
>> Then you could take advantage as follows:
>>
>> final List<URI> uris = new ArrayList<>();
>> // @Observes URI
>> addObserver((Consumer<URI>) uris::add);
>>
>> // @Observes Thread
>> addObserver(Runtime.getRuntime()::addShutdownHook);
>>
>> // @Observes Runnable
>> addObserver((Consumer<Runnable>)
Executors.newFixedThreadPool(3)::submit);
>>
>> // @Observes URI
>> addObserver((Consumer<URI>) System.out::println, new
AnnotationLiteral<Fine>() {
>> });
>>
>> // @Observes Handler
>> final Logger logger = Logger.getLogger("somewhere");
>> addObserver(logger::addHandler); // add handlers via event
>>
>> // @Observes @Fine String
>> addObserver((Consumer<String>) logger::fine, new
AnnotationLiteral<Fine>() {});
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> David Blevins
>>
http://twitter.com/dblevins
>>
http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code
under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For
all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under
the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all
other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.