Hi
I'm +1 for it but it needs important changes (= surely new contexts).
Typically we can't change today @RequestScoped (which has no link with
a request but only with a thread!).
So we could have @RequestScoped (~ @ThreadLocalScoped) and
@InheritedRequestScoped which would be a real request scope (but not
an InheritedThreadLocal please)
For the request it makes a lot of sense since you need to stay thread
safe even accross threads (servlet spec) and avoids to be forced to
use message passing which - even if a good pattern - adds boilerplate
code for simple async needs.
For JAXRS I dont know since it is really suspend/resume semantic so
request scope maybe doesnt makes much sense here (there is a break in
the flow).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
2015-02-19 10:32 GMT+01:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>:
Hi All,
Beyond the asynchronous event case, shouldn’t we provide a way for user to launch async
treatments in CDI with the possibility to keep the existing contexts at the moment of
async operation launch?
Today servlet or JAX-RS spec support async call without the loss of request for instance.
Shouldn’t we think to something like that?
Thanks for your input on that point.
Antoine
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.