[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Mark Struberg commented on CDI-721:
-----------------------------------
[~manovotn] In OWB we still return the same instance of the configurator. This is
perfectly solvable.
And no, I didn't avoid to answer Martins question.
Whether a user manipulates the AnnotatedType via setAnnotatedType or
configureAnnotatedType MUST make absolutely no difference.
By acknowledging that we can further safely assume that both ways should be
interchangeably from a user pov.
As shown with the setAnnotatedType: whatever happens as last step will be the full and
only truth. Any AT change inbetween - which is not being wrapped - will be ultimately
lost. That's the same with setAnnotatedType and I see no way nor reason to change this
for configureAnnotatedType.
Mathematically speaking: if B is an inclusive superset of A then we can widen our solution
from A to B and ensure 100% backward compatibility.
configureAnnotatedType vs setAnnotatedType restrition is unecessarily
strict
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-721
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-721
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Portable Extensions
Affects Versions: 2.0 .Final
Reporter: Mark Struberg
{noformat}
Any observer of this event is permitted to wrap and/or replace the AnnotatedType by
calling either setAnnotatedType() or configureAnnotatedType(). If both methods are called
within an observer notification an IllegalStateException is thrown.
{noformat}
This rule is way too strict without any real reason.
Any CDI container must support that both methods are being called on the same event
payload anyway. Because we did not forbid that observerMethod1 invokes setAnnotatedType
and observerMethod2 uses configureAnnoatedType. And that's good that way, otherwise
the pluggability would be lost.
We should delete this sentence without any substitution.
The same applies to similar configurator methods like configureBeanAttributes, etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)