Hi
i think @EJB Foo<Bar> ignores Bar (or at least the ejb spec doesnt define
it)
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <
https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github:
https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/7/2 Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
On 2 Jul 2013, at 11:28, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> In section 4.2 of the CDI spec (both 1.0 and 1.1) there are references
to injection around generic types. I was wondering if someone could
clarify this case?
>
> I have an interface:
>
> public interface Handler<? extends Foo> { ... }
>
> and then I have two implementations
>
> public class FarlowHandler implements Handler<Farlow> { .. }
>
> public class BagelHandler implements Handler<Bagel> { ... }
>
> Is it expected that I should be able to inject references to these by
doing:
>
> @Inject
> private Handler<Farlow> fHandler;
>
> @Inject
> private Handler<Bagel> bHandler;
Yes.
>
> ? Is there any expected difference when using EJBs?
Assuming the interface is part of the local client view of the EJB, then
no. Obviously, if EJB has any rules around declaring generic types in local
interfaces, then you need to respect those (IIRC, it doesn't).
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev