Re: [cdi-dev] [Vote] @Priority value order on ordered events

Am 08.12.2016 um 12:51 schrieb Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com&gt;: +1 The sentence "Observers with smaller priority values are called first." sounds weird. If it were @Order annotation, the sentence would be fine and natural. But right now, we say that observers with highest priority are notified last. By the way, interceptors are different beasts - an interceptor with the highest priority is "closest" to the bean method invocation, i.e. it's the last one which can react BEFORE the bean method is invoked and the first one which can react AFTER the bean invocation returns (and process the result). Martin Dne 8.12.2016 v 11:45 Matej Novotny napsal(a): > +0 > > Don't really care. Since it's not unified across CDI, having it one way or the other doesn't really make difference to me. > > Matej > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; >> To: "CDI Java EE Specification" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 11:29:11 AM >> Subject: [cdi-dev] [Vote] @Priority value order on ordered events >> >> Hi all, >> >> As already explained in a previous mail [1], some of us would like change the >> current order of events to make the highest @Priority value first and the >> lowest last. This change would be an alinement on how @Alternative work >> (highest value being the first candidate). >> >> If you agree to the change (highest to lowest) vote +1, if you disagree -1 >> and don't care 0. If you want to discuss thread is always open on [1] but >> time is running out. >> >> Vote will end Monday at 12:00 pm CET. >> >> Thanks for your participation. >> >> Antoine >> >> [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2016-November/009330.html >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cdi-dev mailing list >> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >> >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code >> under the Apache License, Version 2 >> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas >> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual >> property rights inherent in such information. > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. > -- Martin Kouba Software Engineer Red Hat, Czech Republic _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.