Martin Kouba created CDI-286:
--------------------------------
Summary: Inconsistencies in chapter "Validation of passivation capable
beans and dependencies"
Key: CDI-286
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-286
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Martin Kouba
The spec states in 6.6.4. "Validation of passivation capable beans and
dependencies":
{quote}
If a bean which declares a passivating scope type, or any stateful session bean, has a
decorator or interceptor which is not a
passivation capable dependency, the container automatically detects the problem and treats
it as a deployment problem.
{quote}
WRT CDI-136 "If a bean which declares a passivating scope type, or any stateful
session bean," should be replaced with: "If a managed bean or stateful session
bean which declares a passivating scope".
I'm not sure about the wording _"has a decorator or interceptor which is not a
passivation capable dependency"_ because the wording in section 6.6.1.
"Passivation capable beans" is _"interceptors and decorators of the bean
are passivation capable"_ (passivation capable dependency vs passivation capable).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira