[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Issue Comment Edited: (CDI-92) Allow injection of Bean object for a bean

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Marius Bogoevici edited comment on CDI-92 at 9/20/11 2:14 PM: -------------------------------------------------------------- @Inject @Delegate means something else in the case of a Decorator anyway (and there's no delegate in the case of an interceptor). Also, I cannot see why there cannot be two separate concerns: a) Inject the bean (which in the case of an Interceptor/Decorator will inject the Interceptor/Decorator itself, they're beans too, nothing wrong with that) b) Inject the target instance or delegate. Since we don't have a common term for interception or decoration we could have two distinct qualifiers: @Inject @Intercepted Bean<?> bean; for interceptors @Inject @Decorated Bean<?> bean; for decorators One point against this would be the proliferation of annotations, but I think that using distinct annotations helps keeping the spec clear. was (Author: marius.bogoevici): @Inject @Delegate means something else in the case of a Decorator anyway (and there's no delegate in the case of an interceptor). Also, I cannot see why there cannot be two separate concerns: a) Inject the bean (which in the case of an Interceptor/Decorator will inject the Interceptor/Decorator itself, they're beans too, nothing wrong with that) b) Inject the target instance or delegate. Since we don't have a common term for interception or decoration we could have two distinct identifiers: @Inject @Intercepted Bean<?> bean; for interceptors @Inject @Decorated Bean<?> bean; for decorators One point against this would be the proliferation of annotations, but I think that using distinct annotations helps keeping the spec clear. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira