[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-377) automatic JSR-330 annotation processing problematic

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ] Antoine Sabot-Durand edited comment on CDI-377 at 2/17/14 11:16 AM: -------------------------------------------------------------------- To sum up my understanding of {{@Singleton}} and other {{@Scope}} management, we have 3 options. # *Stop supporting them in CDI* Not possible IMO due to JSR 330 support and other bad side effects ({{@Dependent}} is annotated with {{@Scope}}) # *Remove them from the list of bean defining annotations list* So by default ({{annotated}} bean-discovery-mode) classes with these Annotation wouldn't be considered as bean. {{@Dependent}} should be an exception. They would always be beans in {{all}} bean-discovery-mode. Perhaps the more consistent approach regarding mixing CDI and other JSR-330 beans in the same archive : allow me to have my Guice beans with {{@Singleton}} and CDI beans with CDI scopes living together. # *Remove them from the list of bean defining annotations list unless one or more classes in the same archive are annotated with a {{@Dependent}} or any Normal Scope annotation* In this case they wouldn't make their archive an implicit bean archive when they are alone. In the case of mixing JSR-330 beans and CDI beans the dev would have to explicitly put a {{@Vetoed}} on non CDI beans to avoid CDI treating them. was (Author: antoinesabot-durand): To sum up regarding {{@Singleton}} and other {{@Scope}} management, we have 3 options. # *Stop supporting them in CDI* Not possible IMO due to JSR 330 support and other bad side effects ({{@Dependent}} is annotated with {{@Scope}}) # *Remove them from the list of bean defining annotations list* So by default ({{annotated}} bean-discovery-mode) classes with these Annotation wouldn't be considered as bean. {{@Dependent}} should be an exception. They would always be beans in {{all}} bean-discovery-mode. Perhaps the more consistent approach regarding mixing CDI and other JSR-330 beans in the same archive : allow me to have my Guice beans with {{@Singleton}} and CDI beans with CDI scopes living together. # *Remove them from the list of bean defining annotations list unless one or more classes in the same archive are annotated with a {{@Dependent}} or any Normal Scope annotation* In this case they wouldn't make their archive an implicit bean archive when they are alone. In the case of mixing JSR-330 beans and CDI beans the dev would have to explicitly put a {{@Vetoed}} on non CDI beans to avoid CDI treating them. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira