Re: [cdi-dev] Looking for Feedback on PR #291

Quick feedback: *) activate might be ambiguous. There is actually a ’start’ and a ‚activate on this very thread‘. Think about @SessionScoped or @ConversationScoped. Not every new thread will start a new Context. Multiple threads might re-use the very same one. Now you need a way to explicitlely say which ’Session’ (or Map) you like to attach to *) @ActivateRequestScope et al. Interesting idea but I fear it wont work out. Let’s stick with the @SessionScoped example: _which_ Session should get created/attached for the very thread? But it’s a start! Thanks for getting the ball rolling. LieGrue, strub > Am 26.05.2016 um 12:42 schrieb John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com&gt;: > > All, > > As mentioned during Tuesday's meeting, I'm looking for more feedback on PR #291 - the context control APIs. I think the current version is pretty snazy, and thanks especially to Martin for his input on it thus far. I'm looking for more input though, especially from the OWB team (Mark Struberg??) on whether its realistic or not. > > https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/291 > > > John > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.