[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
George Gastaldi commented on CDI-110:
-------------------------------------
Then what would be the difference between a ServiceHandler and an Interceptor ?
As stated before, the goal of a ServiceHandler is to provide an implementation to an
abstract class or an interface.
I believe that allowing multiple ServiceHandler(s) would lead to confusion, as when to
create an Interceptor and when to create a ServiceHandler.
Thoughts welcome
Provide support for binding an invocation handler to an interface or
abstract class
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CDI-110
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-110
Project: CDI Specification Issues
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Inheritance and Specialization
Affects Versions: 1.0
Reporter: George Gastaldi
Assignee: George Gastaldi
Labels: cdi
Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed)
The purpose of this feature is to allow interfaces and abstract classes to be
automatically implemented by an invocation handler to which all abstract method
invocations are delegated. The invocation handler would get "bound" to the type
using the same strategy as is used for interceptor binding.
Binding type:
{code:java}
@Target({ METHOD, TYPE })
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@ServiceHandlerBindingType
public @interface EchoService {}
{code}
Invocation handler:
{code:java}
@ServiceHandlerBindingType
@EchoService
public class EchoServiceHandler {
@AroundInvoke
public Object invoke(InvocationContext ctx) {
return ctx.getMethod().getName().toString();
}
}
{code}
Usage:
{code:java}
@EchoService
public interface HelloWorld {
String helloWorld();
}
{code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira