This API offers quite a different view onto CDI than BeanManager, and from the comments
we've received on CDI 1.0 [1] I believe it is an API that people are going to find
more useful, leaving BeanManager for more "power" use cases. This was my reason
to split it out, but I'm open to other suggestions?
On 7 Sep 2011, at 05:14, Lincoln Baxter wrote:
Just wondering, if we have access to the BeanManager, why not just
put select() on that?
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
JBoss, by Red Hat
lbaxter(a)redhat.com
"If you want something, you'll find a way; if you don't, you'll find an
excuse."
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
To: "CDI-Dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2011 6:26:43 PM
Subject: [cdi-dev] Easier access to CDI outside of Java EE, easier access to instances
Regarding
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-14, I've created this patch
https://github.com/jboss/cdi/pull/43.
This also touches on CDI-26, which is about providing an embedded mode (API for starting
CDI) - it covers about 50% of that issue. It doesn't provide a bootstrap API, but it
does provide a programmatic API to access the container:
CDI.current().getBeanManager();
CDI.current().select(MyBean.class).select(new MyQualifierLiteral()).doSomething();
(CDI implements Instance)
I've copied the logic for looking up the current CDI instance from the JPA
Persistence class.
Please review, as I know this addresses two much sought after improvement, and I hope
that the overall ethos of the approach I've taken you guys like. I suspect there are a
couple of rough edges to iron out - specifically, I would like feedback on:
* what happens when multiple CDI providers are located (right now as I straw man I
followed JPA's example and returned the first one loaded, not sure if this right)
* Classloading for the providers (Stuart has a comment here)
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev