Re: [cdi-dev] Consistency across specs with the use of @Priority

From what I recall it is not the same for interceptors and decorators too.

I found this interesting to say the least. In CDI, we use highest priority where the value of the @Priority annotation is compared the higher numeric value is considered higher priority. We followed suite so far in MicroProfile specs. I'm not looking to throw dirt, but wanted to get a general opinion from others on this. The JAX-RS treats the lower numeric value as more important (in mathematical terms, it's being treated as the denominator). > If two or more providers are candidates for a certain task, the one with the highest priority is chosen: the highest priority is defined to be the one with the lowest value in this case. That is, @Priority(1) is higher than @Priority(10). So I'm wondering, why did CDI use the approach that CDI is using? John ------------------------------ NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information which should be treated accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this message, and destroy all physical and electronic copies. Thank you. _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/ licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.