Martin Kouba created CDI-286: -------------------------------- Summary: Inconsistencies in chapter "Validation of passivation capable beans and dependencies" Key: CDI-286 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-286 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Martin Kouba The spec states in 6.6.4. "Validation of passivation capable beans and dependencies": {quote} If a bean which declares a passivating scope type, or any stateful session bean, has a decorator or interceptor which is not a passivation capable dependency, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a deployment problem. {quote} WRT CDI-136 "If a bean which declares a passivating scope type, or any stateful session bean," should be replaced with: "If a managed bean or stateful session bean which declares a passivating scope". I'm not sure about the wording _"has a decorator or interceptor which is not a passivation capable dependency"_ because the wording in section 6.6.1. "Passivation capable beans" is _"interceptors and decorators of the bean are passivation capable"_ (passivation capable dependency vs passivation capable). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira