Re: [forge-dev] Food for thought: Forge scaffolding is not 'continuous'

This is in the pipeline, but not there yet. Mostly I think the feature you are referring to is for communicating file changes *to* JBoss tools. On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Rodney Russ <rruss(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: Isn't there already a mechanism for recognizing changes for the integration with JBoss Tools? Or is that just one way? ----- "Lincoln Baxter, III" <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > From: "Lincoln Baxter, III" <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; > To: "forge-dev List" <forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 12:28:25 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain > Subject: Re: [forge-dev] Food for thought: Seam Forge scaffolding is not 'continuous' > > This is possibly because if you don't "reload" the entity after making > changes in an external editor, Forge doesn't know the file has > changed, and rewrites the same contents... probably something to fix. > > That's my guess as to what they are referring to. Good point though. > > ~Lincoln > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Jason Porter < > lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com > wrote: > > > I'm a little confused by this thinking. Forge will work with whatever > you have there. Generated or not. It isn't going to overwrite anything > you put in there, maybe they were using an old version? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Oct 23, 2011, at 22:50, Richard Kennard < > richard(a)kennardconsulting.com > wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > There's a nice looking presentation up at... > > > > > http://www.slideshare.net/jbaruch/pure-java-rad-and-scaffolding-tools-race > > > > ...that slightly 'dings' Seam Forge for not being 'continuous' > (slide 43). I asked the authors what they meant by this. They said: > > > > "The reason we stated SeamForge scaffolding as one-time is not > because of Metawidget, but because of the fact that generated code > inside the entities is > > not separated from user-created one. e.g. - I generated Person > entity, then changed stuff and added some stuff to it, and SeamForge's > entities editing > > feature is not usable for me anymore (Metawidget's forms rendering > will still work, of course). Just for the contrast, Spring Roo > separated the > > user-generated content from auto-generated content by using > Inter-type declarations. I can edit my entities the way I like and Roo > can mess with its ITDs > > the way it likes" > > > > Just some food for thought? > > > > Richard. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > forge-dev mailing list > > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > > > > -- > Lincoln Baxter, III > http://ocpsoft.com > http://scrumshark.com > "Keep it Simple" > > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.com http://scrumshark.com "Keep it Simple" _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev