On second thought, I think this is not a good idea. You should depend on the parser-java
addon and that is already in the BOM.
Em 29/03/2014, às 15:00, George Gastaldi <ggastald(a)redhat.com> escreveu:
Yes, that would be a good idea. Want to submit a pull-request?
> Em 29/03/2014, às 14:27, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing(a)gmail.com>
> I was writing some samples with Roaster and I was wondering if it would make sense to
have the Roaster artifacts defined in the Forge BOM ? As a developer it would make my life
easier, but then I don't know if you want to tie Forge and Roaster now.
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
> Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Paris JUG | Devoxx France
> forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev mailing list