Californication SWAT team :)
by Max Rydahl Andersen
Hi,
The guys in California: Denis, Alexey, Slava and Daniel have only a few outstanding issues thus they are ready to
help take on issues found elsewhere. And we got plenty to take from.
I've asked them to go active look in jira so don't be surprised if they ask you questions about an issue and
don't be afraid asking Denis or Alexey if they can help with one or more of your issues.
We can do this!
Thank you,
Max
12 years, 10 months
Please cleanup Beta3-CR1-GA/Final in jira
by Max Rydahl Andersen
Hi guys,
Beta2 is done and we are looking at ~400+ issues in jira until GA.
I'll spend most of my travel time to US over the weekend reviewing these but I need your help to make it possible.
Please take the time to go through the issues and prioritize, remove obsolete and duplicate issues.
If something is a *must* please set priority to blocker/critical and if not important major or lower.
If questions about anything then please add comment and assign to me and i'll take a look ASAP and follow up.
We need to get issues down to a manageable level of issues we know are doable - and have the issues identified we simply must react on.
Thank you,
/max
12 years, 10 months
Included features considered harmful (AS, BPEL, jBPM & JSF, please read)
by Mickael Istria
Hi all,
As I am working on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8838 (add
source features to build), I noticed this bug in the mechanics we want
to use: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=374663
(tycho-source-feature-plugin does not resolve remote source features).
But I also noticed that some of you (namely AS, BPEL, jBPM & JSF) do use
included features in your features.
Included features are a kind of anti-pattern for us. The "inclusion" is
a very strict relationship that is resolved at build-time and that locks
version for features. Included features have static versions when it
comes to installing and this can be a source of p2 screed. I think you
can always replace this "inclusion" relationship by a "dependency"
relationship in your feature.xml. Dependencies are resolved at
install-time, and it allow people to perform updates without pain.
I'm totally in favor of replacing inclusions by dependencies. I will do
it for the components listed above. However, I may miss a point that
could justify the inclusion over the dependency. If yes, please tell me
quickly why you did made that choice and why it wouldn't work with
dependencies.
I'm looking for concrete and current issues you have met with
dependencies that are solved by inclusion.
Cheers
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
12 years, 10 months
Fwd: [JBoss Tools Development] - Re: Does JBoss Tools Visual Page Editor support JSF2 tag other than richfaces?
by Max Rydahl Andersen
See below forum thread.
Do we have updated docs/info for how to contribute/develop templates for jsf libraries ?
/max
Begin forwarded message:
> From: suiaing tsui <do-not-reply(a)jboss.com>
> Subject: [JBoss Tools Development] - Re: Does JBoss Tools Visual Page Editor support JSF2 tag other than richfaces?
> Date: March 21, 2012 9:40:22 AM GMT+01:00
> To: Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen(a)redhat.com>
>
> JBoss Community
> Re: Does JBoss Tools Visual Page Editor support JSF2 tag other than richfaces?
> created by suiaing tsui in JBoss Tools Development - View the full discussion
> Thanks.
>
>
> Any tutorials or documentation related to templates setup ?!
>
> Reply to this message by going to Community
> Start a new discussion in JBoss Tools Development at Community
12 years, 10 months