Who uses .target file?
by Mickael Istria
Hi all,
This is an important question for us.
Nick and I are now convinced that .target files are not the panacea to
drive dependency management at build time. It adds a lot of additional
steps and it does not work that easily in the Maven way. We are thinking
of some alternatives way to provide a "dependency" repository that would
contain only the necessary stuff for you to work on your component. Then
we'll just manage this repository instead of a .target file, it should
make our daily work better and remove lot of complexity.
See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-10915 and comments starting
from here
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11157?focusedCommentId=12676643&pag...
for more details/debate.
So we more and more think this .target file is useless, and we'd like to
get rid of it (uselessness is bad). But before that, we'd like to know
whether some of you do use the generated .target file. If yes, we'll
have to think on a better way to make everyone happy. So *if you use
.target file, raise your hand*!
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
12 years, 10 months
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbosstools/trunk/bpmn has been deleted (was Re: An update-site for BPMN ?)
by Nick Boldt
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbosstools/trunk/bpmn has been deleted.
Content still lives in the 3.3.0.Beta1 branch should anyone need it,
care about it, want to fork it, or gaze longingly at it. :)
On 03/16/2012 04:00 PM, Bob Brodt wrote:
> Yes please.
> It looks like the eclipse bpmn2 project has arisen from the dead - they are actually doing nightly builds on hudson now (yay!) and the stuff in jbosstools/trunk is probably no longer needed.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> That component [1] is dead - replaced by newer project(s) at
>> eclipse.org
>> [2].
>>
>> [1] https://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbosstools/trunk/bpmn/
>> [2]
>> https://git.eclipse.org/c/bpmn2-modeler/org.eclipse.bpmn2-modeler.git/
>>
>> It should be removed, IMHO.
>>
>> Bob, Max: do you agree? Should we remove it from trunk?
>>
>> On 03/16/2012 12:30 PM, Mickael Istria wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I noticed the BPMN component does not create an update-site on SVN.
>>> Don't we need one? If there is no update-site, how is it shipped?
>>> --
>>> Mickael Istria
>>> Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat<http://www.jboss.org/tools>
>>> My blog<http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
>>> <http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
>>
>> --
>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>>
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com
12 years, 10 months