On 1 Mar 2017, at 9:14, Jean-Francois Maury wrote:
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen
<manderse(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> On 28 Feb 2017, at 21:42, Mickael Istria wrote:
>
>> On 02/28/2017 07:24 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> sounds awesome if you guys found a way to deal with having to
>>> manually eep these from not overlapping and avoid rerelasing
>>> different bits with the same version number.
>> This was:
>> *
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-13671
>> *
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-19056
>> *
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22689
>
> none of these seem to be new ? these was what was fixe ages ago.
>
> So the version changes provides no benefits and becomes harder to
> keep
> track on ?
>
> Before it could be done more or less automated. Just thought it was
> changing because you guys found a benefit to do so.
>
No, just to lower the load during updates. It is now possible because
less
components are being changed now (mainly OpenShift; server and base)
But that is cool.
Just curious what happens in this case:
Today I download and install latest server tools i.e. version 4.3.0
Tomorrow you release a new update to openshift tools i.e. version 3.4.1
I do check for updates - get nothing (as expected)
Next week I install into a new jboss server tools ...do I get the exact
same bits as the one I downloaded a week ago ? or is this a new set of
binaries just with the same 4.3.0 number ?
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen