February 2007 - jbosstools-dev - Jboss List Archives

[jbosside-dev] JBossIDE nightly build 200702272123-nightly results

by jbosside-build＠jboss.org

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] JBossIDE nightly build 200702262254-nightly results

by jbosside-build＠jboss.org

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] JBossIDE nightly build 200702251740-nightly results

by jbosside-build＠jboss.org

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] JBossIDE nightly build 200702250433-nightly results

by jbosside-build＠jboss.org

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] JBossIDE nightly build 200702231809-nightly results

by jbosside-build＠jboss.org

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] JBossIDE nightly build 200702221945-nightly results

by jbosside-build＠jboss.org

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] JBossIDE nightly build 200702212156-nightly results

by jbosside-build＠jboss.org

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: [jbosside-dev] Language used in package UI is ambigious/confusing

by Max Rydahl Andersen

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:56:04 +0100, Rob Stryker <rstryker(a)redhat.com> wrote: > archive is fine, but i see this as low priority for the upcoming > release. Fixing bugs is much more important right now than naming. Sure lets not delay the release further - bugfixes is priority 1; but its important one usability wise and I guess the API should also be changed or ? /max > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" > <max.andersen(a)redhat.com> > To: <jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org> > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 5:30 AM > Subject: [jbosside-dev] Language used in package UI is > ambigious/confusing > > >> >> I created this isssue a couple of days ago: >> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-448 >> >> I'm not a native speaker myself, but I do believe that "Package" is too >> ambigious to use >> as the name for what the *Packaging* plugin produces. >> >> Could we get some feedback from you guys since the current ui/languague >> confuses more than >> it explains...and that is not good. >> >> My suggestion is to use Archive for the thing that is produced by the >> Packaging (or even "Archive packaging") builder. >> >> -- -- >> Max Rydahl Andersen >> callto://max.rydahl.andersen >> >> Hibernate >> max(a)hibernate.org >> http://hibernate.org >> >> JBoss a division of Red Hat >> max.andersen(a)jboss.com >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosside-dev mailing list >> jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosside-dev >> > -- -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate max(a)hibernate.org http://hibernate.org JBoss a division of Red Hat max.andersen(a)jboss.com

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] Language used in package UI is ambigious/confusing

by Max Rydahl Andersen

I created this isssue a couple of days ago: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-448 I'm not a native speaker myself, but I do believe that "Package" is too ambigious to use as the name for what the *Packaging* plugin produces. Could we get some feedback from you guys since the current ui/languague confuses more than it explains...and that is not good. My suggestion is to use Archive for the thing that is produced by the Packaging (or even "Archive packaging") builder. -- -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate max(a)hibernate.org http://hibernate.org JBoss a division of Red Hat max.andersen(a)jboss.com

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jbosside-dev] JBossIDE nightly build 200702210012-nightly results

by jbosside-build＠jboss.org

17 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbosstools-dev February 2007