Strange versions in branches/jbosstools-2.0.x
by Marshall Culpepper
Hey guys..
I ran through and changed all the versions in 2.0.x branch to 2.0.1, but
wanted to note a few inconsistencies I saw when running through:
- A number of plugins had their versions listed as 2.1.0 originally:
- jsf.vpe.ajax4jsf, jsf.vpe.facelets, jsf.vpe.richfaces,
jsf.vpe.seam, jsf.vpe.tomahawk
- vpe, vpe.ui.palette, vpe.xulrunner (obsolete?)
I changed these back to 2.0.1 as I'm guessing they were changed in
anticipation of the 2.1 release before being the branch was created.
Also, I noticed that the o.j.t.hibernate.hblibs plugin is still using
"old" Eclipse 3.0/2.1 style plugin.xml (with no MANIFEST.MF). Is there
any reason for that?
Max - What do you want the "base" version of Hibernate Tools to be for
this release? 3.2.1 ?
--
Marshall Culpepper
JBoss Developer Studio, JBoss Tools
marshall(a)jboss.org
17 years, 10 months
QA Daily report 06 March 2008
by Aliaksey Nis
Hello Denis,
This is Daily QA report for 06 March 2008.
Tasks performed:
1. Hibernate and JBoss-esb testing at latest 2.1 JBossTools builds.
2. Test cases review. Adding new functionality tests.
--
Best regards,
Aliaksey mailto:anis@exadel.com
17 years, 10 months
Tagging for 2.0.1
by Marshall Culpepper
Hey Denis..
Are we ready to start tagging for 2.0.1? The unit test rate has been
pretty stable and the only errors I see seem to be Resource API related
(maybe related to the the Hibernate JDT UI tests themselves)
--
Marshall Culpepper
JBoss Developer Studio, JBoss Tools
marshall(a)jboss.org
17 years, 10 months
VPE Tests on dev91-linux
by Denis Golovin
Max, Marshall,
I tested all available JVM to get it up, but nothing helped. Next reason
why it fails the OS. I noticed that dev91-linux is running under
os.version 2.6.9-42.0.10.ELsmp
I'd like to try it on dev65-linux or any other host that have Enterprise
Linux 5
Should we ask QA permission for that?
Thanks
Denis
17 years, 10 months
