Ah, understood now and I agree with that approach. I had misunderstood that you thought
milestones weren't allowed.
----- "Nick Boldt" <nboldt(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Yes, but the conflict here is that Max wants the qualifier to start
with
the name (M1, Alpha1), not a timestamp (as we did for JBoss Tools 3.3
/
JBDS 5). This is to avoid being able to incorrectly "upgrade" from M2
to
M1 should the timestamp of the M2 build be older than the M1.
--
To allow OSGi ASCII ordering it's either (NOTE: dates are
hypothetical):
4.0.0.20120830-M1
4.0.0.20120930-M2
4.0.0.Beta1-20121030
4.0.0.CR1-20121115
4.0.0.Final-20121130
or
4.0.0.Alpha1-20120830
4.0.0.Alpha2-20120930
4.0.0.Beta1-20121030
4.0.0.CR1-20121115
4.0.0.Final-20121130
Personally, I prefer the symmetry of the second option.
Note too that 0-9 < A-Z < a-z, so if we move forward w/ Alpha1, users
would have to uninstall that early build to upgrade to features with a
timestamp-Mx qualifier, as 2012 < Alpha1.
N
On 08/30/2012 11:14 AM, Rodney Russ wrote:
> milestone releases are supported by those rules of versioning:
>
> "That brings us to case number two, which is projects that chose to
use milestone releases, instead of the more traditional alpha, beta,
..."
>
> ----- "Nick Boldt" <nboldt(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> In order to:
>>
>> a) adhere to the official
jboss.org rules for versioning [1] and
>>
>> b) to avoid causing anyone who's installed an early milestone
(eg.,
>> 4.0.0.M2) to have to first UNINSTALL before being able to update
to
>> our
>> 4.0.0.Beta1 release Eclipse,
>>
>> we've renamed the first milestone, M1, to Alpha1.
>>
>> This allows us to move through the OSGi ASCII sequence Alpha,
Beta,
>> CR,
>> Final, and GA, with each more stable milestone able to act as an
>> update
>> for the previous.
>>
>> * JIRA targets in JBIDE and JBDS have been renamed. Your issues
will
>> move automatically to the new version targets. Please update your
>> queries.
>>
>> * JBoss Tools' parent pom is now 4.0.0.Alpha1 instead of 4.0.0.M1.
>> I've
>> updated all the components' root poms in both JBT and JBDS SVN
trees
>> to
>> use the newly versioned parent pom, and published the new pom to
>> nexus.
>>
>> See also JBDS-1987 and JBDS-2251.
>>
>> [1]
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning
>>
>> --
>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
>>
http://nick.divbyzero.com
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com