Re: [jbosstools-dev] Regarding launchbar contribution

Since JBT 4.3.0.Final is slated for after Mars SR1, this seems reasonable. You don't technically need to have the same IU names to allow a seamless upgrade from o.j.t.whatever to o.eclipse.wtp.whatever. We've seen multiple instances where a JBoss project moved to Eclipse, and we were able to support the IU rename using a p2.inf instruction. Here's what we did to rename from com.jboss.jbds to com.jboss.devstudio: https://github.com/jbdevstudio/jbdevstudio-product/blob/jbosstools-4.2.x/... We've done similar with m2e-wtp, too. But of course it's simpler if we just build the plugin using the future o.e.wtp name, and a lower version. On 05/19/2015 04:58 PM, Rob Stryker wrote: > Hi All: > > wtp-dev mailing list seems to indicate its a bit too late to get such > a > contribution into Mars. They did suggest it might be reasonable for > SR1. > > With that in mind, we should discuss how to go about getting this > into > JBT for our Mars release, while still allowing it to be removed / > overridden by the eventual contribution to SR1. > > As of now, it seems the thing most important to discuss is naming of > the > plugin, to ensure that the name we use matches with the WTP one. The > idea seems to be that if we release this plugin as 0.9.0 in JBT, it > can > be added to WTP for Mars SR1 with a higher version, thus replacing > ours. > > The issue at wtp can be discussed here: > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=467604 > > > @Nick: Any ideas on whether this plan makes sense? -- Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio http://nick.divbyzero.com _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev