Re: [jbosstools-dev] [m2e-wtp] Workaround or new release or patched plugin?

From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Nick Boldt" <nboldt(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: "Aurelien Pupier" <apupier(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Fred Bricon" <fbricon(a)redhat.com&gt;, jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org, "Paul Leacu" <pleacu(a)redhat.com&gt; Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 7:16:10 PM Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] [m2e-wtp] Workaround or new release or patched plugin? On 25 Aug 2016, at 19:14, Nick Boldt wrote: Some background: I sent Aurelien here when I saw him mention he was pondering doing a feature patch and I said I'm sure we as maintainers of m2e-wtp and the one including it in the base could do better than that. > Just realized this is for Mars, not Neon. > > There's no plan to release a new devstudio or jbosstools release for > Mars, so even if I update the TP that won't automatically get into the > Integration Stack. We always said JBoss Tools/Devstudio would react to emergency releases if IS needs it. Thus saying a release is not planned then that is not a valid reason if it is the only one. Can we not do a basic TP update without a big overhead ? > Perhaps the better solution here is to have Paul pull in the updated > bits to the IS TP. Please remember that even if this is put into the IS TP then it affects base devstudio and jbosstools too. Thus some basic testing/verification would be relevant for jbosstools/devstudio no matter if the update is put in base TP or in IS TP. /max > Paul, WDYT? > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Aurelien Pupier <apupier(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: >> I created a new JIRA issue following the pattern in the right >> project: >> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-23044 >> >> I still cannot assign the issue to you. >> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Aurelien Pupier <apupier(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Nick, >>> >>> thanks for the answer, I created a JIRA for you but I don't have the >>> right >>> to assign it: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-4018 >>> >>> Please notice that it is for the Mars-based Target Platform. >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Nick Boldt <nboldt(a)redhat.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Standard process is: >>>> >>>> a) open a JIRA, assigned to me >>>> b) ping me if I haven't responded within a day or two, or if urgent >>>> c) if the issue is raised BEFORE the target platform freeze (Aug >>>> 31) >>>> it can be resolved on/before that date. >>>> d) if the issue is raised after the target platform freeze, it >>>> requires escalation/approval from Alexey as it jeopardizes the code >>>> freeze on Sept 1. >>>> >>>> So the short answer is "I can do it next week, on/before Aug 31, >>>> unless you need it sooner." >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Fred Bricon <fbricon(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>>> So we could cut a m2e-wtp 1.2.2 release, but you'd need to provide >>>>> a >>>>> patch >>>>> that doesn't use java 1.8. I'll most likely be able to do it on >>>>> saturday or >>>>> monday. Then it depends when can Nick mirror it >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Aurelien Pupier >>>>> <apupier(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I hit this issue today >>>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 >>>>>> "WTPProjectsUtil.removeConflictingFacets(IFacetedProject, >>>>>> IProjectFacetVersion, Set<Action>) is not taking care of actions >>>>>> given >>>>>> as >>>>>> parameter" >>>>>> I provided a fix proposal: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/79617/ >>>>>> >>>>>> I detected it while writing an integration test. While playing >>>>>> manually, i >>>>>> think that some jobs are not played at the same time and it works >>>>>> *almost* >>>>>> every time. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm wondering if someone has an idea for a workaround to this >>>>>> issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> If not, is it possible to create a new release? What is the >>>>>> timeframe >>>>>> for >>>>>> that? The goal is to be able to use it in Fuse Tooling 8.0.0; The >>>>>> current >>>>>> code freeze date is the 29th August (which is very very close). >>>>>> This >>>>>> version >>>>>> is based on JBDS 9.1 (Eclipse Mars) >>>>>> >>>>>> If not possible, do you have an idea of the impact of creating a >>>>>> patch >>>>>> plugin for org.eclipse.m2e.wtp inside Fuse Tooling based on the >>>>>> content of >>>>>> provided gerrit change proposal >>>>>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/79617/ >>>>>> I'm aware that all others JBDS and JBDIS features will be >>>>>> "affected" >>>>>> by >>>>>> this patched plugin if Fuse Tooling is installed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Aurelien Pupier >>>>>> Senior Software Engineer in JBoss Fuse Tooling team >>>>>> @apupier >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>>>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat >>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio >>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Aurelien Pupier >>> Senior Software Engineer in JBoss Fuse Tooling team >>> @apupier >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Aurelien Pupier >> Senior Software Engineer in JBoss Fuse Tooling team >> @apupier > > -- > Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat > Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio > http://nick.divbyzero.com > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev /max http://about.me/maxandersen