Re: [jbosstools-dev] Eclipse Arquillian

I agree. This is super exciting! Perfect timing too for demoing at Devoxx and collecting some feedback. Snjeza, I would love to turn this thread into a blog post on arquillian.org. It's okay if there isn't a release yet, just the information about the work in progress is plenty of news to share, to get people excited and to get them involved. Would you be willing to redraft the original message and incorporate the feedback from this thread (so it's up to date)? You can either send it as an e-mail or, if you are up to the extra challenge, a pull request to the Arquillian website repo. We write blog posts in textile with a small metadata block at the top. You can see examples of other blog posts in the blog directory. If you are tight for time, I'd be more than willing to format the post for you so that you don't have to worry about it. What's most important is capturing the information from you to share.

Again, great work! Cheers, -Dan [1] http://github.com/arquillian/arquillian.github.com [2] example post w/ lots of detail: https://raw.github.com/arquillian/arquillian.github.com/develop/blog/2012... On 10/17/2012 01:22 AM, Xavier Coulon wrote: > Congratulations, Snjezana, this is really awesome !! > > /Xavier > > > > On Oct 16, 2012, at 10:27 PM, Snjezana Peco wrote: > >> I will add a preference that will enable/disable the >> Deployment/Container validation. >> Currently, the Run/Debug As Arquillian launch configuration requires >> exactly one container implementation on the project's classpath. >> >> Snjeza >> >> On 16.10.2012 18:07, Aslak Knutsen wrote: >>> Right, in that context it's needed. >>> >>> You'll need a Deployment to run "In Container", but you can run >>> without a Deployment and just work as a standalone client. >>> >>> You can even run without any Container/Deployment support enabled >>> at all, just as a common abstraction layer between different test >>> frameworks, but... >>> >>> Let's assume the most common use case, which is having a >>> Deployment, and leave it as is for now. >>> >>> -aslak- >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> On 16.10.2012 17:39, Aslak Knutsen wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Wooha, you've been busy since last i had a look! Nice! >>>> >>>> One comment of the top of my head: >>>> >>>> - Validation: a Deployment method is not required. >>>> The following is from the Getting started tutorial ( >>>> http://arquillian.org/guides/getting_started/ ) : >>>> >>>> >>>> Now, about that flair. An Arquillian test case must have three >>>> things: >>>> >>>> 1. A @RunWith(Arquillian.class) annotation on the class >>>> 2. A public static method annotated with @Deployment that returns >>>> a ShrinkWrap archive >>>> 3. At least one method annotated with @Test >>>> >>>> Snjeza >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -aslak- >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Could you please review https://github.com/snjeza/arquillian-eclipse >>>> ? >>>> Your suggestions are welcome. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Snjeza >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > -- Dan Allen dallen(a)redhat.com Principal Software Engineer Middleware Engineering Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev