From: David M Williams <david_williams(a)us.ibm.com&gt; Subject: [wtp-dev] WTP repo to be non-greedy for Juno M5 Date: January 23, 2012 22:16:32 GMT+01:00 To: wtp-dev(a)eclipse.org Reply-To: "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev(a)eclipse.org&gt; [I have sent a similar note to "cross project" list, but in case anyone follows wtp-dev, but not cross-project list, I'll repeat it here.] WTP has updated to a Juno based p2 publisher so the repository it produces will treat optional dependencies as "non greedy". See bug 247099 [1] and the p2 Publisher wiki [2] for some history and details on this issue of greedy vs. non-greedy requirements. The change in WTP build was documented in bug 369171 [3]. In short, p2 assumes greedy='true' if it is not specified and in the past the publisher did not specify it, so there have been many cases in the past where users and adopters get things installed that they did not want or need. Plus, it would depend on which repo was "pointed to" or what was available in that repo at the time of the install, making installs indeterminate. Rather than change the way p2 works (which would have had compatibility issues) it was decided to change the way the p2 publisher works. Most of the time, this change will be nothing but goodness ... and does not change WTP itself ... but I'm giving this notice since the change in the repo metadata does have the potential to "break" someone downstream ... or, at least, not work as expected. Potentially it could effect builds, if you use p2 to fetch pre-reqs and if you really required some optional thing, but did not specify it explicitly, you might have been getting it "by accident" before, due to a bundle having it as an optional dependencies. The more likely impact would be in distribution packages or user installs which might have the same issue, of wanting something they got before "by accident" but would not now be installed, unless explicitly specified in a feature. The fix, if any required, in most cases will be to add some missing optional item to your feature; sometimes it would be an existing feature, but often might be a new feature, in order to let users or adopters decide if they want that optional thing or not. If you do encounter an issue where this change effects your project or adoptions, especially in a negative way, please leave a note in bug 369171 so we understand unanticipated impacts. Thanks, [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=247099 [2] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/p2/Publisher [3] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=369171 _______________________________________________ wtp-dev mailing list wtp-dev(a)eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev