[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-24868) Server adapter: Switch off pod livenessProbe.periodSecond property and router timeout during debug session
by Roland Huß (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Roland Huß commented on JBIDE-24868:
------------------------------------
Some remarks:
1) actually I haven't experienced that kind of timeout much (so when debugging with IntelliJ the connection seemed to stay open, maybe IntelliJ is sending some kind of ping, intentional or unintentional).
2) the router timeout is imo the biggest pita. The solution via port-forwarding is often not possible:
* A Single Page App's UI doesn't use relative URL to access the backend for requests, so can't be changed to use the forwarded port
* The application is composed via MicroServices which are aggregated on the route level (i.e. the routed spans and defines the REST URL namespace), so for an application to work it might be mandatory to go over the route (e.g. our Syndesis app is example of this kind of application)
3) On a second thought, I don't think anymore that this is critical. The recommendation to choose to suspend only on the thread should cover 99% of all use cases, so changing the deployment config on the fly (and causing a redeployment for this) is too much effort for too less gain imo.
Maybe we could get at least an option to Minishift which can influence the router's global timeout value? For many developers this would be already a big help.
> Server adapter: Switch off pod livenessProbe.periodSecond property and router timeout during debug session
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-24868
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24868
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: openshift
> Affects Versions: 4.5.0.Final
> Reporter: Aurélien Pupier
> Assignee: Andre Dietisheim
> Labels: openshift_v3, server_adapter
> Fix For: 4.5.x
>
>
> it will avoid to have "debug connections always killed after 30s staying in a breakpoint"
> see https://twitter.com/ro14nd/status/895886024387067904 for source of suggestion
> k8 documentations on the matter are here: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-livene...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-24868) Server adapter: Switch off pod livenessProbe.periodSecond property and router timeout during debug session
by Roland Huß (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Roland Huß edited comment on JBIDE-24868 at 8/30/17 5:00 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Some remarks:
1) actually I haven't experienced that kind of timeout much (so when debugging with IntelliJ the connection seemed to stay open, maybe IntelliJ is sending some kind of ping, intentional or unintentional).
2) the router timeout is imo the biggest pita. The solution via port-forwarding is often not possible:
* A Single Page App's UI doesn't use relative URL to access the backend for requests, so can't be changed to use the forwarded port
* The application is composed via MicroServices which are aggregated on the route level (i.e. the routed spans and defines the REST URL namespace), so for an application to work it might be mandatory to go over the route (e.g. our Syndesis app is example of this kind of application)
3) On a second thought, I don't think anymore that this is critical. The recommendation to choose to suspend only on the thread should cover 99% of all use cases, so changing the deployment config on the fly (and causing a redeployment for this) is too much effort for too less gain imo.
Maybe we could get at least an option to Minishift which can influence the router's global timeout value? For many developers this would be already a big help.
was (Author: rhuss):
Some remarks:
1) actually I haven't experienced that kind of timeout much (so when debugging with IntelliJ the connection seemed to stay open, maybe IntelliJ is sending some kind of ping, intentional or unintentional).
2) the router timeout is imo the biggest pita. The solution via port-forwarding is often not possible:
* A Single Page App's UI doesn't use relative URL to access the backend for requests, so can't be changed to use the forwarded port
* The application is composed via MicroServices which are aggregated on the route level (i.e. the routed spans and defines the REST URL namespace), so for an application to work it might be mandatory to go over the route (e.g. our Syndesis app is example of this kind of application)
3) On a second thought, I don't think anymore that this is critical. The recommendation to choose to suspend only on the thread should cover 99% of all use cases, so changing the deployment config on the fly (and causing a redeployment for this) is too much effort for too less gain imo.
Maybe we could get at least an option to Minishift which can influence the router's global timeout value? For many developers this would be already a big help.
> Server adapter: Switch off pod livenessProbe.periodSecond property and router timeout during debug session
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-24868
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-24868
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: openshift
> Affects Versions: 4.5.0.Final
> Reporter: Aurélien Pupier
> Assignee: Andre Dietisheim
> Labels: openshift_v3, server_adapter
> Fix For: 4.5.x
>
>
> it will avoid to have "debug connections always killed after 30s staying in a breakpoint"
> see https://twitter.com/ro14nd/status/895886024387067904 for source of suggestion
> k8 documentations on the matter are here: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-livene...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-4527) rh-eclipse47-devstudio is pointing to a non-existing rpm snapshot
by Jan Richter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-4527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Jan Richter updated JBDS-4527:
------------------------------
Description:
Attempting to install rh-eclipse47-devstudio from the devtools channel results in a 404:
{noformat}
No Presto metadata available for rh-eclipse47-devstudio-snapshot-11
rh-eclipse47-devstudio-11.1-0. FAILED
https://devstudio.redhat.com/11/snapshots/rpms/11.1.0/x86_64/rh-eclipse47...: [Errno 14] HTTPS Error 404 - Not Found
Trying other mirror.
To address this issue please refer to the below knowledge base article
https://access.redhat.com/articles/1320623
If above article doesn't help to resolve this issue please open a ticket with Red Hat Support.
Error downloading packages:
rh-eclipse47-devstudio-11.1-0.20170830.0037.el7.x86_64: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
{noformat}
Unsurprisingly, this also blocks rh-devsuite installation.
was:
Attempting to install rh-eclipse47-devstudio from the devtools channel results in a 404:
{noformat}
No Presto metadata available for rh-eclipse47-devstudio-snapshot-11
rh-eclipse47-devstudio-11.1-0. FAILED
https://devstudio.redhat.com/11/snapshots/rpms/11.1.0/x86_64/rh-eclipse47...: [Errno 14] HTTPS Error 404 - Not Found
Trying other mirror.
To address this issue please refer to the below knowledge base article
https://access.redhat.com/articles/1320623
If above article doesn't help to resolve this issue please open a ticket with Red Hat Support.
Error downloading packages:
rh-eclipse47-devstudio-11.1-0.20170830.0037.el7.x86_64: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
Unsurprisingly, this also blocks rh-devsuite installation.
{noformat}
> rh-eclipse47-devstudio is pointing to a non-existing rpm snapshot
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBDS-4527
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-4527
> Project: Red Hat JBoss Developer Studio (devstudio)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: rpm
> Affects Versions: 11.0.0.GA
> Reporter: Jan Richter
> Assignee: Nick Boldt
> Priority: Blocker
>
> Attempting to install rh-eclipse47-devstudio from the devtools channel results in a 404:
> {noformat}
> No Presto metadata available for rh-eclipse47-devstudio-snapshot-11
> rh-eclipse47-devstudio-11.1-0. FAILED
> https://devstudio.redhat.com/11/snapshots/rpms/11.1.0/x86_64/rh-eclipse47...: [Errno 14] HTTPS Error 404 - Not Found
> Trying other mirror.
> To address this issue please refer to the below knowledge base article
> https://access.redhat.com/articles/1320623
> If above article doesn't help to resolve this issue please open a ticket with Red Hat Support.
> Error downloading packages:
> rh-eclipse47-devstudio-11.1-0.20170830.0037.el7.x86_64: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
> {noformat}
> Unsurprisingly, this also blocks rh-devsuite installation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-4527) rh-eclipse47-devstudio is pointing to a non-existing rpm snapshot
by Jan Richter (JIRA)
Jan Richter created JBDS-4527:
---------------------------------
Summary: rh-eclipse47-devstudio is pointing to a non-existing rpm snapshot
Key: JBDS-4527
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-4527
Project: Red Hat JBoss Developer Studio (devstudio)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: rpm
Affects Versions: 11.0.0.GA
Reporter: Jan Richter
Assignee: Nick Boldt
Priority: Blocker
Attempting to install rh-eclipse47-devstudio from the devtools channel results in a 404:
{noformat}
No Presto metadata available for rh-eclipse47-devstudio-snapshot-11
rh-eclipse47-devstudio-11.1-0. FAILED
https://devstudio.redhat.com/11/snapshots/rpms/11.1.0/x86_64/rh-eclipse47...: [Errno 14] HTTPS Error 404 - Not Found
Trying other mirror.
To address this issue please refer to the below knowledge base article
https://access.redhat.com/articles/1320623
If above article doesn't help to resolve this issue please open a ticket with Red Hat Support.
Error downloading packages:
rh-eclipse47-devstudio-11.1-0.20170830.0037.el7.x86_64: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
Unsurprisingly, this also blocks rh-devsuite installation.
{noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 2 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3761) when replacing an existing VBox install, should use the same install folder; could also ask user where they want VirtualBox installed
by Denis Golovin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Denis Golovin closed JBDS-3761.
-------------------------------
> when replacing an existing VBox install, should use the same install folder; could also ask user where they want VirtualBox installed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBDS-3761
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3761
> Project: Red Hat JBoss Developer Studio (devstudio)
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: platform-installer
> Affects Versions: 9.1.0.CR1
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Nick Boldt
> Fix For: 10.2.0.AM3
>
> Attachments: JBDS3761-VBox508installed-but-honeybadger-installer-doesnt-care.png, vbox-install-omits-guestadditions.png
>
>
> I had Virtual Box 5.0.16 installed.
> The dev platform installer (build 33) decided 5.0.16 was bad, uninstalled it, and instead installed 5.0.8 into C:\DeveloperPlatform\virtualbox (where I had had it installed to the default folder, c:\Program Files\Oracle\VirtualBox.
> As a result, my existing VB install cannot find the Guest Additions iso image.
> !vbox-install-omits-guestadditions.png!
> I suggest that since the installation of Virtual Box isn't something that is necessarily tied into the DevPlatform, it should be installed into its default folder, c:\Program Files\Oracle\VirtualBox, rather than C:\DeveloperPlatform\virtualbox.
> Or if not, the installer could ask the user if they want to use the default folder (for reuse) or install under the DeveloperPlatform folder (for a more self-contained installation footprint).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
8 years, 2 months