December 2014 - jbosstools-issues

[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3288) Google plugins for Luna available - do we want them?

by Martin Malina (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Martin Malina updated JBDS-3288: -------------------------------- Comment: was deleted (was: [~burrsutter], any thoughts on this?) > Google plugins for Luna available - do we want them? > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBDS-3288 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3288 > Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio) > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: central > Affects Versions: 8.0.1.GA > Reporter: Martin Malina > Assignee: Burr Sutter > > If I remember correctly we removed the google plugins from central because they didn't have a version compatible with Luna. > Today I randomly noticed that they have it now: > https://developers.google.com/eclipse/docs/install-eclipse-4.4 > So I wonder if we're interested in adding them back in central. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341)

11 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3288) Google plugins for Luna available - do we want them?

by Martin Malina (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Martin Malina commented on JBDS-3288: ------------------------------------- [~burrsutter], any thoughts on this? > Google plugins for Luna available - do we want them? > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBDS-3288 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3288 > Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio) > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: central > Affects Versions: 8.0.1.GA > Reporter: Martin Malina > Assignee: Burr Sutter > > If I remember correctly we removed the google plugins from central because they didn't have a version compatible with Luna. > Today I randomly noticed that they have it now: > https://developers.google.com/eclipse/docs/install-eclipse-4.4 > So I wonder if we're interested in adding them back in central. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341)

11 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3288) Google plugins for Luna available - do we want them?

by Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Max Rydahl Andersen reassigned JBDS-3288: ----------------------------------------- Assignee: Burr Sutter > Google plugins for Luna available - do we want them? > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBDS-3288 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3288 > Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio) > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: central > Affects Versions: 8.0.1.GA > Reporter: Martin Malina > Assignee: Burr Sutter > > If I remember correctly we removed the google plugins from central because they didn't have a version compatible with Luna. > Today I randomly noticed that they have it now: > https://developers.google.com/eclipse/docs/install-eclipse-4.4 > So I wonder if we're interested in adding them back in central. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341)

11 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3288) Google plugins for Luna available - do we want them?

by Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBDS-3288: ------------------------------------------- I believe no since we dropped GWT specific support at the same time too. Assigning to Burr if he has a preference. > Google plugins for Luna available - do we want them? > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBDS-3288 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3288 > Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio) > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: central > Affects Versions: 8.0.1.GA > Reporter: Martin Malina > > If I remember correctly we removed the google plugins from central because they didn't have a version compatible with Luna. > Today I randomly noticed that they have it now: > https://developers.google.com/eclipse/docs/install-eclipse-4.4 > So I wonder if we're interested in adding them back in central. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341)

11 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3288) Google plugins for Luna available - do we want them?

by CDW Engine (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] CDW Engine updated JBDS-3288: ----------------------------- CDW pm_ack: ? CDW release: ? > Google plugins for Luna available - do we want them? > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBDS-3288 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3288 > Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio) > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: central > Affects Versions: 8.0.1.GA > Reporter: Martin Malina > > If I remember correctly we removed the google plugins from central because they didn't have a version compatible with Luna. > Today I randomly noticed that they have it now: > https://developers.google.com/eclipse/docs/install-eclipse-4.4 > So I wonder if we're interested in adding them back in central. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341)

11 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3288) Google plugins for Luna available - do we want them?

by Martin Malina (JIRA)

Martin Malina created JBDS-3288: ----------------------------------- Summary: Google plugins for Luna available - do we want them? Key: JBDS-3288 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3288 Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio) Issue Type: Feature Request Components: central Affects Versions: 8.0.1.GA Reporter: Martin Malina If I remember correctly we removed the google plugins from central because they didn't have a version compatible with Luna. Today I randomly noticed that they have it now: https://developers.google.com/eclipse/docs/install-eclipse-4.4 So I wonder if we're interested in adding them back in central. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341)

11 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18919) Weak performance on Software/Update tab features loading

by Mickael Istria (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Mickael Istria commented on JBIDE-18919: ---------------------------------------- Code did not change for that class since 4.2.0.Final/8.0.0.GA release and the underlying dependencies (Mylyn) did not change between 8.0.0.GA and 8.0.1. Line mentioned by [~rhopp] is not supposed to do network access (only filesystem to read p2 state), so it shouldn't be a network issue neither. > Weak performance on Software/Update tab features loading > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-18919 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18919 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: central > Affects Versions: 4.2.1.CR1 > Reporter: Pavol Srna > Assignee: Mickael Istria > Fix For: 4.2.1.Final > > > It takes about ~1 minute to load content into Software/Update tab in central. > Some of my colleagues noticed this too. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341)

11 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (TOOLSDOC-576) MobileDev How To: Add DYK for LiveReload auto-enabled for BrowserSim

by Michelle Murray (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Michelle Murray commented on TOOLSDOC-576: ------------------------------------------ DYK = Did You Know (final section of doc with extra tips for users) Yeah I ran into this issue today - now I must update to JDK 8 :) > MobileDev How To: Add DYK for LiveReload auto-enabled for BrowserSim > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: TOOLSDOC-576 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-576 > Project: Documentation for JBoss Tools and Developer Studio > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: User Guide - Mobile Web Tools > Affects Versions: 4.2.1.Final > Reporter: Michelle Murray > Assignee: Michelle Murray > Fix For: 4.2.1.Final > > > See https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/pull/295 > From [~kmarmaliykov] > {quote} > I'd also notice that if you have livereload server started and then open browsersim livereload will be enabled by default(this feature is available from 4.2.1) > {quote} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341)

11 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18862) when removing a module from AS runtime marker files are not removed automatically

by Rob Stryker (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Rob Stryker commented on JBIDE-18862: ------------------------------------- This is a very nice dream to have, but until the app server has some type of incremental deployment API where "The AS is in control of all file changes to the deployment area itself", we're stuck with standard filesystem operations. If you seem to be more into your server adapter using management operations to communicate with the server, then I'd suggest when you create a server adapter, you configure it to either local+mgmt or rse+mgmt profiles. These will use full management for deployments, but necessarily loses the possibility of incremental deployment to some extent. It's still quite fast when in local mode, but must send the entire zipped deployment over the wire when re-deploying large projects against an actual remote machine. In these profiles, we don't use the filesystem to deploy at all, and do not deal with marker files at all. All deployments are done via the management API. > when removing a module from AS runtime marker files are not removed automatically > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-18862 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18862 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: server > Environment: Windiws7 64bit, JDK 8u25 > Reporter: Darryl Miles > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.2.2.Final, 4.3.0.Alpha1 > > > module removal does not delete the various marker files relating to it: > *.undeployed > *.dodeploy > The same should be true when ADDING a module, it should clean out any marker files. > Setup an deploy-inhibiting marker file to ensure it won't try to deploy it before the *.ear is full written. > Write out the*.ear file. > Then adjust the marker files as necessary to reflect the intended state of the module (if it should be started then remove the inhibiting marker file in the previous step). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341)

11 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3286) Remove Seam tooling from default JBDS installation

by Nick Boldt (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Nick Boldt reassigned JBDS-3286: -------------------------------- Assignee: Nick Boldt > Remove Seam tooling from default JBDS installation > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBDS-3286 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3286 > Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio) > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: central, installer, seam > Affects Versions: 9.0.0.Alpha1 > Reporter: Fred Bricon > Assignee: Nick Boldt > Fix For: 9.0.0.Alpha1 > > > With Seam being pretty much dead and the tools in maintenance mode, I'm opening this issue to discuss whether we should drop Seam from the JBDS installer and only keep it available from JBoss Central (required as part of JBIDE-18922 already). > [~burrsutter], [~maxandersen], [~ldimaggio], [~akazakov], [~mmurray] : WDYT? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341)

11 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbosstools-issues December 2014