[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-17234) Cannot launch BrowserSim on Windows 8.1 (32- or 64-bit) w/ JDK 7 or 8
by Nick Boldt (JIRA)
Nick Boldt created JBIDE-17234:
----------------------------------
Summary: Cannot launch BrowserSim on Windows 8.1 (32- or 64-bit) w/ JDK 7 or 8
Key: JBIDE-17234
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-17234
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Bug
Environment: Windows 8.1 Pro, 64-bit
Reporter: Nick Boldt
System details:
I have tried the following:
a) install jbdevstudio-product-universal-8.0.0.Beta1-v20140408-2350-B93.jar via commandline, using JDK 7 (32- and 64-bit) and JDK 8 (64-bit). Using the 32-bit JDK, I've both used and omitted the -d32 flag.
b) In Central, click either `Start from scratch > HTML5 Project`, or `Start from a sample > Mobile Applications > kitchensink-html5-mobile`
c) In Project Explorer, open `src > main > webapp > index.html`
d) right-click the file and select `Open With > BrowserSim`
If JBDS was installed in 32-bit mode, you get this error:
If JBDS was installed in 64-bit mode, you get this error:
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.3#6260)
11 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-17233) Add usage tracking for the WS Tester
by Xavier Coulon (JIRA)
Xavier Coulon created JBIDE-17233:
-------------------------------------
Summary: Add usage tracking for the WS Tester
Key: JBIDE-17233
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-17233
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Task
Components: webservices
Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Beta1
Reporter: Xavier Coulon
Add usage tracking when the WS Tester is opened and when a request is submitted, so we can see how many people use it (or not)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.3#6260)
11 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-17022) Show in Console does not work for remote servers
by Rob Stryker (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-17022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Rob Stryker commented on JBIDE-17022:
-------------------------------------
upstream has nixed my idea and suggested I do a complicated fake iprocess wrapper to simulate a process. I am not sure how feasible this is.
> Show in Console does not work for remote servers
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-17022
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-17022
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: server, upstream
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Beta1
> Environment: JBDS 8.0.0.Beta1a B82
> Reporter: Martin Malina
> Assignee: Rob Stryker
> Fix For: 4.2.0.Beta2
>
>
> When you have a remote server running and select Show In on the server, you can see the Console item is greyed out and cannot be clicked.
> This is because of an upstream bug - unused items should be removed so we can add our working Console item.
> So this JIRA is both to track the upstream bug and once that is fixed, we can fix this on our end.
> Upstream bugzilla is here: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=431910
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.3#6260)
11 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TOOLSDOC-492) Create new docs landing page on new tools.jboss.org site (moving to asciidoc for docs in process)
by Nick Boldt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
Nick Boldt updated TOOLSDOC-492:
--------------------------------
Attachment: asciidoc-to-html5-with-sidebar-toc.png
Using this:
{code}
asciidoc -b html5 -a icons -a toc2 -a theme=flask -d book openshift_tools.adoc
{code}
I can get this:
!asciidoc-to-html5-with-sidebar-toc.png!
> Create new docs landing page on new tools.jboss.org site (moving to asciidoc for docs in process)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TOOLSDOC-492
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-492
> Project: Documentation for JBoss Tools and Developer Studio
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: User Guide
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Michelle Murray
> Fix For: 4.2.0.Beta2
>
> Attachments: asciidoc-to-html5-with-sidebar-toc.png, converted-adoc-asciidoc-css-not-github-css.png, converted-adoc-github-css-actual.png, converted-adoc-github-css.png, openshift-chapter-generated-epub.png, openshift-chapter-generated-pdf.png
>
>
> With the release of the new tools.jboss.org site, it's time to migrate the docs to the same skin / format / markup. Docbook is dead, long live Asciidoc!
> What [~mmurray] and I are thinking is that we would have a new landing page similar to one of these:
> http://tools.jboss.org/features/ (with icons that link to projects' latest doc)
> or
> http://tools.jboss.org/documentation/whatsnew/ (with the latest doc linked)
> And then under that landing page we'd have doc for each of projects' contributions to the User Guide, by milestone or Final release.
> Questions:
> a. [~maxandersen] [~burrsutter] [~mmusaji] Do we still need to provide 3 formats of doc - HTML, HTML-single, and PDF? Or can we replace that with this new content, PLUS include inline help doc within Eclipse? (That's another issue - see [~dgolovin] 's https://github.com/dgolovin/jbosstools-eclipse-docs/blob/master/docs/scen... for prototype)
> b. [~maxandersen] Should we include docs for "dead" projects like Freemarker, Portal, etc.? I'm guessing YES, even if the doc becomes out of date (ie., the doc for JBT 4.2 for Freemarker won't have changed much (or at all) since JBT 4.0/4.1).
> c. [~maxandersen] Should we convert old JBT 4.1.x (and/or 4.0.x, 3.3.x) doc to the new adoc format, or just start w/ the JBT 4.2.0.Beta1/2 doc? I'd be OK with 4.1 and maybe 4.0, but can we skip 3.3 since JBDS 5 is no longer fully supported?
> d. Will docbook2asciidoc [0] work for batch-converting docbook docs to adoc? @nick will try. If conversion works easily, then converting older User Guides is definitely more doable / less time consuming.
> [0] https://github.com/oreillymedia/docbook2asciidoc
> e. [~xcoulon] Is :page-component_version: still used, eg., in [1], or is the filename version itself used to categorize the content by milestone?
> [1] https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-website/blob/master/documentatio...
> f. If we decide to continue to include other formats (eg., html-single, pdf) should we link to those from these places [2], [3]?
> [2] http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/overview.html
> [3] http://tools.jboss.org/downloads/jbosstools/luna/4.2.0.Beta1.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.3#6260)
11 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-17230) GTK and BrowserSim web engine issue on Fedora
by Michelle Murray (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-17230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Michelle Murray updated JBIDE-17230:
------------------------------------
Issue Type: Bug (was: Enhancement)
> GTK and BrowserSim web engine issue on Fedora
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-17230
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-17230
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: browsersim
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Michelle Murray
>
> Here's my bad user experience:
> I'm running Fedora19. I've seen GTK3 issues so I always set 'export SWT_GTK3=0' before starting JBDS.
> I make a HTML5 app, deploy to EAP 6.2 and then try to view on BrowserSim. But when I start BrowserSim I see an error message stating "WebKitGTK 1.2.0 or newer must be installed and in library load path". I've got libwebkit2gtk 2.0.4 installed so don't know how to resolve this.
> After much head scratching I finally remember about BrowserSim GTK preferences and web engine options. Within Window>Preferences>JBoss Tools>BrowserSim/CordovaSim, I see that GTK2 is selected. The GTK2 button label states that this will allow me to use JavaFX which needs Oracle JDK. I don't have Oracle JDK installed as this isn't supported by RH for use with Fedora. Perhaps this is why I see the earlier error message? So I try selecting GTK3. I run BrowserSim again and it starts but then I start to see GTK3 UI issues in BrowserSim.
> So I want to use GTK2 and SWT WebKit for BrowserSim on Fedora. Is there a specific reason I can't (other than the IDE won't let me)?
> Issues:
> 1) Can the first error message be more helpful?
> 2) Can the info on the error message wiki link be updated to detail why this error is being seen on Linux? (current info about similar message related to Windows and JRE7 issue - needs updating anyway as suggests using Java 6 as fallback for Windows but JBDS 8 doesn't support Java 6 for running IDE)
> 2) Can selecting GTK2 set BrowserSim to use SWT WebKit and then users change web engine preference to JavaFX if they want?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.3#6260)
11 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TOOLSDOC-494) Add info on BrowserSim web engines + options
by Michelle Murray (JIRA)
Michelle Murray created TOOLSDOC-494:
----------------------------------------
Summary: Add info on BrowserSim web engines + options
Key: TOOLSDOC-494
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TOOLSDOC-494
Project: Documentation for JBoss Tools and Developer Studio
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: User Guide - BrowserSim
Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Beta1
Reporter: Michelle Murray
Assignee: Michelle Murray
Fix For: 4.2.0.Beta2
Alternative web engine available for BrowserSim/CordovaSim.
This lifts previous Windows restrictions (need for Safari 32-bit).
Both web engines are available for Mac OS X.
Only JavaFX is available for Windows (unless install Safari and go down 32-bit route).
Both web engines are available for RHEL, providing Oracle JDK installed and happy to use GTK2 or GTK3.
Only SWT WebKit is available for Fedora/Ubuntu, as Oracle JDK not supported by RH for use with IDE.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.3#6260)
11 years, 11 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-17230) GTK and BrowserSim web engine issue
by Michelle Murray (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-17230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Michelle Murray updated JBIDE-17230:
------------------------------------
Description:
Here's my bad user experience:
I'm running Fedora19. I've seen GTK3 issues so I always set 'export SWT_GTK3=0' before starting JBDS.
I make a HTML5 app, deploy to EAP 6.2 and then try to view on BrowserSim. But when I start BrowserSim I see an error message stating "WebKitGTK 1.2.0 or newer must be installed and in library load path". I've got libwebkit2gtk 2.0.4 installed so don't know how to resolve this.
After much head scratching I finally remember about BrowserSim GTK preferences and web engine options. Within Window>Preferences>JBoss Tools>BrowserSim/CordovaSim, I see that GTK2 is selected. The GTK2 button label states that this will allow me to use JavaFX which needs Oracle JDK. I don't have Oracle JDK installed as this isn't supported by RH for use with Fedora. Perhaps this is why I see the earlier error message? So I try selecting GTK3. I run BrowserSim again and it starts but then I start to see GTK3 UI issues in BrowserSim.
So I want to use GTK2 and SWT WebKit for BrowserSim on Fedora. Is there a specific reason I can't (other than the IDE won't let me)?
Issues:
1) Can the first error message be more helpful?
2) Can the info on the error message wiki link be updated to detail why this error is being seen on Linux? (current info about similar message related to Windows and JRE7 issue - needs updating anyway as suggests using Java 6 as fallback for Windows but JBDS 8 doesn't support Java 6 for running IDE)
2) Can selecting GTK2 set BrowserSim to use SWT WebKit and then users change web engine preference to JavaFX if they want?
was:
Within Window>Preferences>JBoss Tools>BrowserSim/CordovaSim, selecting GTK for BrowserSim seems to be available for Linux-based OS only.
I can choose GTK2 or GTK3.
I'm running the IDE under GTK2 (export SWT_GTK3=0) to avoid UI issues. So I select to run BrowserSim also under GTK2 - seems sensible. But when I start BrowserSim I see the error message stating
> GTK and BrowserSim web engine issue
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-17230
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-17230
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: browsersim
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Beta1
> Reporter: Michelle Murray
>
> Here's my bad user experience:
> I'm running Fedora19. I've seen GTK3 issues so I always set 'export SWT_GTK3=0' before starting JBDS.
> I make a HTML5 app, deploy to EAP 6.2 and then try to view on BrowserSim. But when I start BrowserSim I see an error message stating "WebKitGTK 1.2.0 or newer must be installed and in library load path". I've got libwebkit2gtk 2.0.4 installed so don't know how to resolve this.
> After much head scratching I finally remember about BrowserSim GTK preferences and web engine options. Within Window>Preferences>JBoss Tools>BrowserSim/CordovaSim, I see that GTK2 is selected. The GTK2 button label states that this will allow me to use JavaFX which needs Oracle JDK. I don't have Oracle JDK installed as this isn't supported by RH for use with Fedora. Perhaps this is why I see the earlier error message? So I try selecting GTK3. I run BrowserSim again and it starts but then I start to see GTK3 UI issues in BrowserSim.
> So I want to use GTK2 and SWT WebKit for BrowserSim on Fedora. Is there a specific reason I can't (other than the IDE won't let me)?
> Issues:
> 1) Can the first error message be more helpful?
> 2) Can the info on the error message wiki link be updated to detail why this error is being seen on Linux? (current info about similar message related to Windows and JRE7 issue - needs updating anyway as suggests using Java 6 as fallback for Windows but JBDS 8 doesn't support Java 6 for running IDE)
> 2) Can selecting GTK2 set BrowserSim to use SWT WebKit and then users change web engine preference to JavaFX if they want?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.3#6260)
11 years, 11 months