September 2014 - jbosstools-issues

[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3166) XML identation size is not editable

by Denis Golovin (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Denis Golovin commented on JBDS-3166: ------------------------------------- I'm trying to replicate under Fedora 20. So far I tested with Open JDK_1.7.0_65 and Oracle JDK 1.7.0_20 in Gnome 3 and Cinnamon. No luck yet. Updating my Fedora 19 guest to have the same env to test. > XML identation size is not editable > ----------------------------------- > > Key: JBDS-3166 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3166 > Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: upstream > Affects Versions: 8.0.0.CR1 > Environment: JBDS 8.0.CR1b, Eclipse 4.4 > I have Fedora 19, Java 1.7_60, Gnome3, it is both case for JBDS 8.x and Eclipse 4.4 > Colleague of mine has RHEL7 with Gnome, tested on JBDS 8.x as well. > Reporter: Stefan Miklosovic > Assignee: Denis Golovin > Fix For: 8.0.x, 9.0.x > > > https://mojo.redhat.com/servlet/JiveServlet/showImage/102-149246-4-928027... > Window -> Preferencies -> XML -> XML Files -> Editor > Ident using spaces is checked. > Identation size field is not editable, there is still "1" in it. Clicking at arrows (or + - buttons) does not work. I can not rise it to 4 spaces. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18449) remove VJET from Central/Early Access

by Nick Boldt (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Nick Boldt commented on JBIDE-18449: ------------------------------------ I like to have inline docs for a few months because it prevents the "why did we remove this? where's the JIRA?" questions. And for the comedic value of being asked later to add it back in, which IIRC has happened before too. :) Recovering code by uncommenting it is easier than doing git diffs to compare old hashes. > remove VJET from Central/Early Access > ------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-18449 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18449 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build, central, target-platform, updatesite > Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1 > Reporter: Nick Boldt > Assignee: Mickael Istria > Priority: Blocker > > As approved by Fred, Burr, and Max: > {quote} > On 09/29/2014 11:15 AM, Burr Sutter wrote: > > +1 > > On Sep 29, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Fred Bricon <fbricon(a)redhat.com> wrote: > >> +1 to remove it. > >> Do we have usage tracking data about it? > >> Fred > >> > >> Le 29 sept. 2014 a 05:46, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com> a ecrit : > >>> VJET is not maintained anymore it seems. > >>> We don't use it. We moved it from tech preview to earlyaccess, but now wondering why we even bother. > >>> Anyone object if we remove it from earlyaccess ? > >>> Anyone actually use it and found it good ? > {quote} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18451) JMX Navigator pollutes error log with NullPointerException on Update Timer Cancel event

by Rob Stryker (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Rob Stryker updated JBIDE-18451: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.2.0.CR2 > JMX Navigator pollutes error log with NullPointerException on Update Timer Cancel event > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-18451 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18451 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: jmx > Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1 > Environment: Fedora 20 x86_64, Java 7, Gnome 3 > Reporter: Denis Golovin > Fix For: 4.2.0.CR2 > > > I see a lot of exceptions in JBDS log like one below: > {code}java.lang.NullPointerException > at org.jboss.tools.jmx.jvmmonitor.internal.tools.Tools.findHomeDirectoryToAddToClasspath(Tools.java:669) > at org.jboss.tools.jmx.jvmmonitor.internal.tools.Tools.configureClassPathAndLibraryPath(Tools.java:691) > at org.jboss.tools.jmx.jvmmonitor.internal.tools.Tools.<init>(Tools.java:77) > at org.jboss.tools.jmx.jvmmonitor.internal.tools.Tools.getInstance(Tools.java:89) > at org.jboss.tools.jmx.jvmmonitor.internal.tools.JvmAttachHandler.updatesActiveJvms(JvmAttachHandler.java:93) > at org.jboss.tools.jmx.jvmmonitor.internal.tools.JvmAttachHandler$1.run(JvmAttachHandler.java:73) > at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:555) > at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:505){code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18447) Both of jbosstools-discovery publish same version of Central TPs

by Nick Boldt (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Nick Boldt commented on JBIDE-18447: ------------------------------------ OK, is this better? https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-discovery/commit/c9b39f79445234a... > Both of jbosstools-discovery publish same version of Central TPs > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-18447 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18447 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: discovery, target-platform > Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1 > Reporter: Mickael Istria > Assignee: Nick Boldt > Fix For: 4.3.0.Alpha1 > > > jbosstools-discovery plugin is branched according to JBoss Tools train. However, it contains TPs that are versioned according to Eclipse release train. > Because of that, we currently have the same version of the Discovery target definitions on both master and jbosstools-4.2.x branch. That leads to some uncertainity about which branch/job is going to publish the Central site. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18430) Update Thym release on TP [4.2.0 CR2]

by Gorkem Ercan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Gorkem Ercan commented on JBIDE-18430: -------------------------------------- [~mickael_istria] Seems to be working fine for me. And we did not have any changes to dependencies > Update Thym release on TP [4.2.0 CR2] > ------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-18430 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18430 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: target-platform, upstream > Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1 > Reporter: Gorkem Ercan > Assignee: Mickael Istria > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 4.2.0.CR2 > > > *Reason:* Update Eclipse Thym to pickup fixes to JBDS issues > *License and owner:* Eclipse > *Original p2 repo:* http://download.eclipse.org/thym/snapshots (buildId=201409261806) > *JBoss mirror:* http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/requirements/thym/0.1.0-SNAP... > *Sources:* https://github.com/eclipse/thym > *Affected projects:* jbosstools-aerogear > *Include in JBDS:* YES > *Type of dependency:* build > *List of bundles added/removed:* > {code} > TODO > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18450) Include EGit 3.5.0 in JBDS 8

by Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBIDE-18450: --------------------------------------------- no reason to spend time on this now. We have zero requests/need for this and should not spend time on it before after GA if nothing is broken. > Include EGit 3.5.0 in JBDS 8 > ---------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-18450 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18450 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Task > Components: build, openshift, target-platform, updatesite > Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1 > Reporter: Andre Dietisheim > Assignee: Andre Dietisheim > Fix For: 4.2.1.Final, 4.3.0.Alpha1 > > > From Andre: > {quote} > I'd argue that since OpenShift is using git our users would benefit from > any improvement in EGit. So big +1 for me! > > You mean +1 for 4.2.0/8.0.0 ? > > If so, do you think you can make extensive testing of this newer EGit > > and evaluate how well it integrates in JBT/JBDS before Thursday ? > yeah, worth it imho (if max agrees). I'll do that. > {quote} > -- http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/2014-September/009369.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18450) Include EGit 3.5.0 in JBDS 8

by Andre Dietisheim (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Andre Dietisheim commented on JBIDE-18450: ------------------------------------------ there's nothing that requires us to have this happening for CR2, thus moving to 4.3.x > Include EGit 3.5.0 in JBDS 8 > ---------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-18450 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18450 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Task > Components: build, openshift, target-platform, updatesite > Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1 > Reporter: Andre Dietisheim > Assignee: Andre Dietisheim > Fix For: 4.2.1.Final, 4.3.0.Alpha1 > > > From Andre: > {quote} > I'd argue that since OpenShift is using git our users would benefit from > any improvement in EGit. So big +1 for me! > > You mean +1 for 4.2.0/8.0.0 ? > > If so, do you think you can make extensive testing of this newer EGit > > and evaluate how well it integrates in JBT/JBDS before Thursday ? > yeah, worth it imho (if max agrees). I'll do that. > {quote} > -- http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/2014-September/009369.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18450) Include EGit 3.5.0 in JBDS 8

by Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Max Rydahl Andersen updated JBIDE-18450: ---------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.2.1.Final > Include EGit 3.5.0 in JBDS 8 > ---------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-18450 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18450 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Task > Components: build, openshift, target-platform, updatesite > Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1 > Reporter: Andre Dietisheim > Assignee: Andre Dietisheim > Fix For: 4.2.1.Final, 4.3.0.Alpha1 > > > From Andre: > {quote} > I'd argue that since OpenShift is using git our users would benefit from > any improvement in EGit. So big +1 for me! > > You mean +1 for 4.2.0/8.0.0 ? > > If so, do you think you can make extensive testing of this newer EGit > > and evaluate how well it integrates in JBT/JBDS before Thursday ? > yeah, worth it imho (if max agrees). I'll do that. > {quote} > -- http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/2014-September/009369.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18450) Include EGit 3.5.0 in JBDS 8

by Andre Dietisheim (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Andre Dietisheim updated JBIDE-18450: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.3.0.Alpha1 (was: 4.2.0.CR2) > Include EGit 3.5.0 in JBDS 8 > ---------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-18450 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18450 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Task > Components: build, openshift, target-platform, updatesite > Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1 > Reporter: Andre Dietisheim > Assignee: Andre Dietisheim > Fix For: 4.3.0.Alpha1 > > > From Andre: > {quote} > I'd argue that since OpenShift is using git our users would benefit from > any improvement in EGit. So big +1 for me! > > You mean +1 for 4.2.0/8.0.0 ? > > If so, do you think you can make extensive testing of this newer EGit > > and evaluate how well it integrates in JBT/JBDS before Thursday ? > yeah, worth it imho (if max agrees). I'll do that. > {quote} > -- http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/2014-September/009369.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18449) remove VJET from Central/Early Access

by Mickael Istria (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Mickael Istria commented on JBIDE-18449: ---------------------------------------- Why not simply removing the various blocks instead of commenting them? We already have git to keep the history. > remove VJET from Central/Early Access > ------------------------------------- > > Key: JBIDE-18449 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18449 > Project: Tools (JBoss Tools) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: build, central, target-platform, updatesite > Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1 > Reporter: Nick Boldt > Assignee: Mickael Istria > Priority: Blocker > > As approved by Fred, Burr, and Max: > {quote} > On 09/29/2014 11:15 AM, Burr Sutter wrote: > > +1 > > On Sep 29, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Fred Bricon <fbricon(a)redhat.com> wrote: > >> +1 to remove it. > >> Do we have usage tracking data about it? > >> Fred > >> > >> Le 29 sept. 2014 a 05:46, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com> a ecrit : > >>> VJET is not maintained anymore it seems. > >>> We don't use it. We moved it from tech preview to earlyaccess, but now wondering why we even bother. > >>> Anyone object if we remove it from earlyaccess ? > >>> Anyone actually use it and found it good ? > {quote} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.1#6329)

11 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbosstools-issues September 2014