[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18449) remove VJET from Central/Early Access
by Nick Boldt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Nick Boldt updated JBIDE-18449:
-------------------------------
Description:
As approved by Fred, Burr, and Max:
{quote}
On 09/29/2014 11:15 AM, Burr Sutter wrote:> +1
> On Sep 29, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Fred Bricon <fbricon(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> +1 to remove it.
>> Do we have usage tracking data about it?
>> Fred
>>
>> Le 29 sept. 2014 a 05:46, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com> a ecrit :
>>> VJET is not maintained anymore it seems.
>>> We don't use it. We moved it from tech preview to earlyaccess, but now wondering why we even bother.
>>> Anyone object if we remove it from earlyaccess ?
>>> Anyone actually use it and found it good ?
{quote}
was:
As approved by Fred, Burr, and Max:
{quote}
On 09/29/2014 11:15 AM, Burr Sutter wrote:> +1
> On Sep 29, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Fred Bricon <fbricon(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> +1 to remove it.
>> Do we have usage tracking data about it?
>> Fred
>>
>> Le 29 sept. 2014 � 05:46, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com> a �crit :
>>> VJET is not maintained anymore it seems.
>>> We don't use it. We moved it from tech preview to earlyaccess, but now wondering why we even bother.
>>> Anyone object if we remove it from earlyaccess ?
>>> Anyone actually use it and found it good ?
{quote}
> remove VJET from Central/Early Access
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-18449
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18449
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build, central, target-platform, updatesite
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Mickael Istria
> Priority: Blocker
>
> As approved by Fred, Burr, and Max:
> {quote}
> On 09/29/2014 11:15 AM, Burr Sutter wrote:> +1
> > On Sep 29, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Fred Bricon <fbricon(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >> +1 to remove it.
> >> Do we have usage tracking data about it?
> >> Fred
> >>
> >> Le 29 sept. 2014 a 05:46, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com> a ecrit :
> >>> VJET is not maintained anymore it seems.
> >>> We don't use it. We moved it from tech preview to earlyaccess, but now wondering why we even bother.
> >>> Anyone object if we remove it from earlyaccess ?
> >>> Anyone actually use it and found it good ?
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18449) remove VJET from Central/Early Access
by Nick Boldt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Nick Boldt updated JBIDE-18449:
-------------------------------
Description:
As approved by Fred, Burr, and Max:
{quote}
On 09/29/2014 11:15 AM, Burr Sutter wrote:
> +1
> On Sep 29, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Fred Bricon <fbricon(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> +1 to remove it.
>> Do we have usage tracking data about it?
>> Fred
>>
>> Le 29 sept. 2014 a 05:46, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com> a ecrit :
>>> VJET is not maintained anymore it seems.
>>> We don't use it. We moved it from tech preview to earlyaccess, but now wondering why we even bother.
>>> Anyone object if we remove it from earlyaccess ?
>>> Anyone actually use it and found it good ?
{quote}
was:
As approved by Fred, Burr, and Max:
{quote}
On 09/29/2014 11:15 AM, Burr Sutter wrote:> +1
> On Sep 29, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Fred Bricon <fbricon(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> +1 to remove it.
>> Do we have usage tracking data about it?
>> Fred
>>
>> Le 29 sept. 2014 a 05:46, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com> a ecrit :
>>> VJET is not maintained anymore it seems.
>>> We don't use it. We moved it from tech preview to earlyaccess, but now wondering why we even bother.
>>> Anyone object if we remove it from earlyaccess ?
>>> Anyone actually use it and found it good ?
{quote}
> remove VJET from Central/Early Access
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-18449
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18449
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build, central, target-platform, updatesite
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Mickael Istria
> Priority: Blocker
>
> As approved by Fred, Burr, and Max:
> {quote}
> On 09/29/2014 11:15 AM, Burr Sutter wrote:
> > +1
> > On Sep 29, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Fred Bricon <fbricon(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >> +1 to remove it.
> >> Do we have usage tracking data about it?
> >> Fred
> >>
> >> Le 29 sept. 2014 a 05:46, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com> a ecrit :
> >>> VJET is not maintained anymore it seems.
> >>> We don't use it. We moved it from tech preview to earlyaccess, but now wondering why we even bother.
> >>> Anyone object if we remove it from earlyaccess ?
> >>> Anyone actually use it and found it good ?
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18449) remove VJET from Central/Early Access
by Nick Boldt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Nick Boldt updated JBIDE-18449:
-------------------------------
Assignee: Mickael Istria
> remove VJET from Central/Early Access
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-18449
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18449
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build, central, target-platform, updatesite
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Mickael Istria
> Priority: Blocker
>
> As approved by Fred, Burr, and Max:
> {quote}
> On 09/29/2014 11:15 AM, Burr Sutter wrote:> +1
> > On Sep 29, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Fred Bricon <fbricon(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >> +1 to remove it.
> >> Do we have usage tracking data about it?
> >> Fred
> >>
> >> Le 29 sept. 2014 � 05:46, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse(a)redhat.com> a �crit :
> >>> VJET is not maintained anymore it seems.
> >>> We don't use it. We moved it from tech preview to earlyaccess, but now wondering why we even bother.
> >>> Anyone object if we remove it from earlyaccess ?
> >>> Anyone actually use it and found it good ?
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-18451) JMX Navigator pollutes error log with NullPointerException on Update Timer Cancel event
by Denis Golovin (JIRA)
Denis Golovin created JBIDE-18451:
-------------------------------------
Summary: JMX Navigator pollutes error log with NullPointerException on Update Timer Cancel event
Key: JBIDE-18451
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-18451
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: jmx
Affects Versions: 4.2.0.CR1
Environment: Fedora 20 x86_64, Java 7, Gnome 3
Reporter: Denis Golovin
I see a lot of exceptions in JBDS log like one below:
{code}java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.jboss.tools.jmx.jvmmonitor.internal.tools.Tools.findHomeDirectoryToAddToClasspath(Tools.java:669)
at org.jboss.tools.jmx.jvmmonitor.internal.tools.Tools.configureClassPathAndLibraryPath(Tools.java:691)
at org.jboss.tools.jmx.jvmmonitor.internal.tools.Tools.<init>(Tools.java:77)
at org.jboss.tools.jmx.jvmmonitor.internal.tools.Tools.getInstance(Tools.java:89)
at org.jboss.tools.jmx.jvmmonitor.internal.tools.JvmAttachHandler.updatesActiveJvms(JvmAttachHandler.java:93)
at org.jboss.tools.jmx.jvmmonitor.internal.tools.JvmAttachHandler$1.run(JvmAttachHandler.java:73)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:555)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:505){code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.1#6329)
11 years, 6 months