[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-21725) Use RedDeer 1.x nightly in master builds
by Martin Malina (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-21725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Martin Malina commented on JBIDE-21725:
---------------------------------------
[~mickael_istria], so you suggest instead of having this in [integration tests parent pom|https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-integration-tests/blob/maste...]:
{code}
<reddeer-master-site>http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/snapshots/builds/reddeer_master/</reddeer-master-site>
<reddeer-site>${reddeer-master-site}</reddeer-site>
{code}
To have this in [jbosstools parent pom|https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-build/blob/master/parent/pom...]:
{code}
<reddeer-site>http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/mars/snapshots/builds/reddeer_master/</reddeer-site>
{code}
We can do that, but that would only be an improvement if we know some other repo wants to use it, no? Or you think it's beneficial even if it's just us who uses it? I'm fine with that.
> Use RedDeer 1.x nightly in master builds
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-21725
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-21725
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: target-platform
> Affects Versions: 4.3.1.Beta2
> Reporter: Martin Malina
> Assignee: Nick Boldt
> Fix For: 4.4.0.Alpha1
>
>
> Martin said:
> {quote}Nick Boldt, ok, I will discuss this with others and then get back to you - I'm not sure if now is the right time to pull a nightly or we should wait.
> I think the intention was to have this in the TP so that we know exactly what is used with which version of JBT - just look in the corresponding TP. That's also how it works for server depending on base - it's the same version. But pointing to RedDeer master repo is different.
> After discussion with Rastislav Wagner, here's our proposal: What if we stick with RedDeer master repo in our pom for integration tests master? For maintenance branch (4.3.x), it's good that we have a stable version of RedDeer in the TP and we can use that. But for JBT master, we can rely on the RedDeer master repo directly and later when we start testing JBT 4.4.0.Alpha1, we may put some version of RedDeer to the TP and switch to that.
> What do you think? Makes sense?
> So if you agree, this would mean that for now we won't use RedDeer in TP 4.60.0 - so either you can just leave it there until we replace it with a new version, or you could even remove it.{quote}
> Nick said:
> {quote}Makes sense. When stable, add to TP; until stable, just use nightly.
> Re: updating 4.60.0.Alpha1, unless there's a compelling reason to remove it from the TP, I'm good to leave 1.0.1 in there [1].
> [1] http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbosstoolstarget/4.6...
> Let me know if you need assistance setting up your pom to depend on Red Deer 1.x nightly URL.{quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-21725) Use RedDeer 1.x nightly in master builds
by Mickael Istria (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-21725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Mickael Istria commented on JBIDE-21725:
----------------------------------------
I believe if you want reddeer to evolve together with JBT and have JBT using nightly builds of Red Deer, the best is to define the site in JBT parent pom, like most jbosstools-whatever component. Then the module that need it can define the dependency to the repository.
> Use RedDeer 1.x nightly in master builds
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-21725
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-21725
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: target-platform
> Affects Versions: 4.3.1.Beta2
> Reporter: Martin Malina
> Assignee: Nick Boldt
> Fix For: 4.4.0.Alpha1
>
>
> Martin said:
> {quote}Nick Boldt, ok, I will discuss this with others and then get back to you - I'm not sure if now is the right time to pull a nightly or we should wait.
> I think the intention was to have this in the TP so that we know exactly what is used with which version of JBT - just look in the corresponding TP. That's also how it works for server depending on base - it's the same version. But pointing to RedDeer master repo is different.
> After discussion with Rastislav Wagner, here's our proposal: What if we stick with RedDeer master repo in our pom for integration tests master? For maintenance branch (4.3.x), it's good that we have a stable version of RedDeer in the TP and we can use that. But for JBT master, we can rely on the RedDeer master repo directly and later when we start testing JBT 4.4.0.Alpha1, we may put some version of RedDeer to the TP and switch to that.
> What do you think? Makes sense?
> So if you agree, this would mean that for now we won't use RedDeer in TP 4.60.0 - so either you can just leave it there until we replace it with a new version, or you could even remove it.{quote}
> Nick said:
> {quote}Makes sense. When stable, add to TP; until stable, just use nightly.
> Re: updating 4.60.0.Alpha1, unless there's a compelling reason to remove it from the TP, I'm good to leave 1.0.1 in there [1].
> [1] http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/targetplatforms/jbosstoolstarget/4.6...
> Let me know if you need assistance setting up your pom to depend on Red Deer 1.x nightly URL.{quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-21386) Create and use Neon M5 target platform
by Nick Boldt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-21386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Nick Boldt commented on JBIDE-21386:
------------------------------------
Still to do:
* mirror WTP, BIRT, other projects we use which are not already in Neon M5 mirror
* update JBT/JBDS/Central TPs using Neon M5, WTP M5, m2e-apt 1.2, latest AERI 1.100, easymport, etc.
* send emails to jbosstools-dev@ asking for feedback
* merge changes to TPs; build
* send emails to jbosstools-dev@ confirming changes applied& TPs updated
* notify on JBDS-3600 that AERI 1.100.latest is updated in 4.60.x TP
> Create and use Neon M5 target platform
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-21386
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-21386
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: target-platform, upstream
> Affects Versions: 4.4.0.Alpha1
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Nick Boldt
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 4.4.0.Alpha1
>
> Attachments: jbds-tp-p2diff-460-summary.txt, jbds-tp-p2diff-460.txt, jbt-tp-p2diff-460-summary.txt, jbt-tp-p2diff-460.txt, jbtcentral-p2diff_460.txt
>
>
> Prepare TP to use Neon M5 bits. Cloned from JBIDE-20976 so I can start a fresh issue.
> https://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php?title=Neon/Simultaneous_Release_Plan#S...
> Story points: 21 (fibonacci)
> * jbt tp,
> * jbds tp,
> * central tp;
> * jbt-build-sites,
> * jbds site build;
> * update install/matrix jobs to use new Eclipse JEE/platform binary;
> * mailing list announcements
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3650) username used for cdk could not be used with vagrant up on cdk
by Alexey Kazakov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Alexey Kazakov commented on JBDS-3650:
--------------------------------------
[~maxandersen] I mentioned this issue before. Denis's user name doesn't have RHEL subscription needed for registration during vargrant up. We need to solve this problem so, users registered on the site will have all needed subscriptions or instructions what they need to do to use the product.
> username used for cdk could not be used with vagrant up on cdk
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBDS-3650
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3650
> Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cdk, installer
> Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen
> Priority: Blocker
>
> in demo by [~dgolovin] he mentions the username used for running the installer could not be used with vagrant registration.
> Why is that ? just unique for denis usernames or general problem ?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-21680) Trouble installing Hibernate Tools
by Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-21680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBIDE-21680:
---------------------------------------------
I've updated the marketplace entries to say they explicitly only works for <= Previous to Juno
> Trouble installing Hibernate Tools
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-21680
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-21680
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: hibernate
> Affects Versions: 4.3.1.Beta2
> Reporter: Koen Aers
> Assignee: Koen Aers
> Fix For: 4.4.0.Alpha1
>
>
> Hello,
> I was attempting to install the Hibernate Tools for a quick demo but it somehow managed to confuse me.. I probably should know better, but I imagine this could represent quite some population out there.
> I headed for the Eclipse marketplace (not the web page but the UI element within Eclipse) after a clean installation of Eclipse Mars update 1.
> I search for "Hibernate Tools", and then it seems I have to choose between "Indigo" and "Helios".
> TBH I didn't remember that those were Eclipse codename versions, so that's one problem.. I get in trouble trying to install either of course and it takes me a while to figure I need to search for "JBoss Tools" instead.. and probably reinstall my whole IDE to clean the mess.
> Searching for "JBoss Tools" isn't great either BTW as the correct result is just third, which means it's not even visible without using the scrollbar..
> I understand we want to push the "JBoss Tools" portfolio but ultimately I think we'd be better off by making sure that people get the right stuff when searching for "Hibernate Tools", as lots of people are accustomed to this name nowadays?
> Thanks,
> Sanne
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-21680) Trouble installing Hibernate Tools
by Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-21680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Max Rydahl Andersen commented on JBIDE-21680:
---------------------------------------------
it is a generic issue of choosing between having marketplace entry for every imaginable plugin features vs a unified install experience. Same issue occurs for switchyard, fuse, etc. for now we've gone for the "not having to test and maintain multiple marketplace entries" appraoch.
btw. you should *not* see indigo nor helios when searching from withing Eclipse marketplace.
That is definitely an error.
> Trouble installing Hibernate Tools
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-21680
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-21680
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: hibernate
> Affects Versions: 4.3.1.Beta2
> Reporter: Koen Aers
> Assignee: Koen Aers
> Fix For: 4.4.0.Alpha1
>
>
> Hello,
> I was attempting to install the Hibernate Tools for a quick demo but it somehow managed to confuse me.. I probably should know better, but I imagine this could represent quite some population out there.
> I headed for the Eclipse marketplace (not the web page but the UI element within Eclipse) after a clean installation of Eclipse Mars update 1.
> I search for "Hibernate Tools", and then it seems I have to choose between "Indigo" and "Helios".
> TBH I didn't remember that those were Eclipse codename versions, so that's one problem.. I get in trouble trying to install either of course and it takes me a while to figure I need to search for "JBoss Tools" instead.. and probably reinstall my whole IDE to clean the mess.
> Searching for "JBoss Tools" isn't great either BTW as the correct result is just third, which means it's not even visible without using the scrollbar..
> I understand we want to push the "JBoss Tools" portfolio but ultimately I think we'd be better off by making sure that people get the right stuff when searching for "Hibernate Tools", as lots of people are accustomed to this name nowadays?
> Thanks,
> Sanne
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBDS-3651) Reduce the delay between the main window opening and the first page being rendered
by Jan Richter (JIRA)
Jan Richter created JBDS-3651:
---------------------------------
Summary: Reduce the delay between the main window opening and the first page being rendered
Key: JBDS-3651
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-3651
Project: Developer Studio (JBoss Developer Studio)
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: installer
Reporter: Jan Richter
Starting the installer right now leaves the user with about 3 seconds of staring at an empty window before the content shows up.
I've done a few tests on this matter and it seems majority of those 3 seconds is spent on angular bootstrap - mainly loading the required files and registering controllers. Replacing the index with simple static HTML causes the page to render almost instantaneously.
We should consider some way of showing the GUI before the user falls asleep (before angular fully loads the entire app).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 10 months