[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22718) NullPointerException in HIDDEN
by Snjezana Peco (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Snjezana Peco updated JBIDE-22718:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.4.1.Final
(was: 4.4.1.AM3)
> NullPointerException in HIDDEN
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22718
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22718
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: arquillian
> Affects Versions: 4.4.0.Final
> Reporter: Automated Error Reporting Bot
> Assignee: Snjezana Peco
> Fix For: 4.4.1.Final
>
>
> The following problem was reported via the automated error reporting:
> Message:
> {noformat}
> java.lang.NullPointerException: null
> at HIDDEN.HIDDEN(HIDDEN:-1)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:-2)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at org.jboss.tools.arquillian.ui.internal.utils.ArquillianUIUtil.addContainerProperties(ArquillianUIUtil.java:581)
> at org.jboss.tools.arquillian.ui.internal.utils.ArquillianUIUtil.getArquillianProperties(ArquillianUIUtil.java:507)
> at org.jboss.tools.arquillian.ui.internal.launcher.ArquillianTab.initializeFrom(ArquillianTab.java:644)
> at org.eclipse.debug.ui.AbstractLaunchConfigurationTab.activated(AbstractLaunchConfigurationTab.java:411)
> at org.eclipse.debug.internal.ui.launchConfigurations.LaunchConfigurationTabGroupViewer.handleTabSelected(LaunchConfigurationTabGroupViewer.java:1365)
> at org.eclipse.debug.internal.ui.launchConfigurations.LaunchConfigurationTabGroupViewer$6.widgetSelected(LaunchConfigurationTabGroupViewer.java:377)
> at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.TypedListener.handleEvent(TypedListener.java:248)
> at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:84)
> {noformat}
> Bundles:
> | org.eclipse.core.runtime | 3.11.1.v20150903-1804 | 3.11.1.v20150903-1804 |
> | org.eclipse.debug.ui | 3.11.101.v20160203-1230 | 3.11.101.v20160203-1230 |
> | org.eclipse.jface | 3.11.1.v20160128-1644 | 3.11.1.v20160128-1644 |
> | org.eclipse.swt | 3.104.2.v20160212-1350 | 3.104.2.v20160212-1350 |
> | org.eclipse.ui | 3.107.0.v20150507-1945 | 3.107.0.v20150507-1945 |
> | org.jboss.tools.arquillian.ui | 1.2.1.Final-v20160331-0142-B69 | 1.2.1.Final-v20160331-0142-B69 |
> Operating Systems:
> | Windows | 6.3.0 | 6.3.0 |
> The above information is a snapshot of the collected data. Visit [this page|https://redhat.ctrlflow.com/reviewers/#!/problems/57344b2ee4b0138d62...] for the latest data.
> Thank you for your assistance.
> Your friendly error-reports-inbox.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22863) InvalidClassException below ArquillianUtility.getVersions (thrown in ObjectStreamClass.initNonProxy)
by Snjezana Peco (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Snjezana Peco updated JBIDE-22863:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.4.1.Final
(was: 4.4.1.AM3)
> InvalidClassException below ArquillianUtility.getVersions (thrown in ObjectStreamClass.initNonProxy)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22863
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22863
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: arquillian
> Affects Versions: 4.4.1.AM1
> Reporter: Automated Error Reporting Bot
> Assignee: Snjezana Peco
> Fix For: 4.4.1.Final
>
>
> The following problem was reported via the automated error reporting:
> Message: Can't read workspace state
> {noformat}
> java.io.InvalidClassException: org.eclipse.m2e.core.internal.project.registry.BasicProjectRegistry; local class incompatible: stream classdesc serialVersionUID = 5542512601401896748, local class serialVersionUID = 6232274446642339434
> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.initNonProxy(ObjectStreamClass.java:616)
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readNonProxyDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1630)
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readClassDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1521)
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readNonProxyDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1630)
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readClassDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1521)
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1781)
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1353)
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:373)
> at org.eclipse.m2e.core.internal.project.registry.ProjectRegistryReader.readWorkspaceState(ProjectRegistryReader.java:100)
> at org.eclipse.m2e.core.internal.project.registry.ProjectRegistryManager.<init>(ProjectRegistryManager.java:163)
> at org.eclipse.m2e.core.internal.MavenPluginActivator.start(MavenPluginActivator.java:211)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.framework.BundleContextImpl$3.run(BundleContextImpl.java:771)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.framework.BundleContextImpl$3.run(BundleContextImpl.java:1)
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:-2)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.framework.BundleContextImpl.startActivator(BundleContextImpl.java:764)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.framework.BundleContextImpl.start(BundleContextImpl.java:721)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.framework.EquinoxBundle.startWorker0(EquinoxBundle.java:941)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.framework.EquinoxBundle$EquinoxModule.startWorker(EquinoxBundle.java:318)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.container.Module.doStart(Module.java:571)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.container.Module.start(Module.java:439)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.framework.util.SecureAction.start(SecureAction.java:454)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.hooks.EclipseLazyStarter.postFindLocalClass(EclipseLazyStarter.java:107)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.classpath.ClasspathManager.findLocalClass(ClasspathManager.java:531)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.ModuleClassLoader.findLocalClass(ModuleClassLoader.java:324)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.BundleLoader.findLocalClass(BundleLoader.java:327)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.sources.SingleSourcePackage.loadClass(SingleSourcePackage.java:36)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.BundleLoader.findClassInternal(BundleLoader.java:398)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.BundleLoader.findClass(BundleLoader.java:352)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.BundleLoader.findClass(BundleLoader.java:344)
> at org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.ModuleClassLoader.loadClass(ModuleClassLoader.java:160)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:357)
> at org.jboss.tools.arquillian.core.internal.util.ArquillianUtility.getVersions(ArquillianUtility.java:625)
> at org.jboss.tools.arquillian.ui.internal.preferences.ArquillianPreferencePage.createContents(ArquillianPreferencePage.java:88)
> at org.eclipse.jface.preference.PreferencePage.createControl(PreferencePage.java:241)
> at org.eclipse.jface.preference.PreferenceDialog.createPageControl(PreferenceDialog.java:1450)
> at org.eclipse.jface.preference.PreferenceDialog$13.run(PreferenceDialog.java:1217)
> at org.eclipse.core.runtime.SafeRunner.run(SafeRunner.java:42)
> at org.eclipse.ui.internal.JFaceUtil$1.run(JFaceUtil.java:50)
> at org.eclipse.jface.util.SafeRunnable.run(SafeRunnable.java:173)
> at org.eclipse.jface.preference.PreferenceDialog.showPage(PreferenceDialog.java:1209)
> at org.eclipse.ui.internal.dialogs.FilteredPreferenceDialog.showPage(FilteredPreferenceDialog.java:608)
> at org.eclipse.jface.preference.PreferenceDialog$9$1.run(PreferenceDialog.java:675)
> at org.eclipse.swt.custom.BusyIndicator.showWhile(BusyIndicator.java:70)
> at org.eclipse.jface.preference.PreferenceDialog$9.selectionChanged(PreferenceDialog.java:670)
> at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer$3.run(StructuredViewer.java:877)
> at org.eclipse.core.runtime.SafeRunner.run(SafeRunner.java:42)
> at org.eclipse.ui.internal.JFaceUtil$1.run(JFaceUtil.java:50)
> at org.eclipse.jface.util.SafeRunnable.run(SafeRunnable.java:173)
> at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer.firePostSelectionChanged(StructuredViewer.java:874)
> at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer.handlePostSelect(StructuredViewer.java:1243)
> at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer$5.widgetSelected(StructuredViewer.java:1269)
> at org.eclipse.jface.util.OpenStrategy.firePostSelectionEvent(OpenStrategy.java:265)
> at org.eclipse.jface.util.OpenStrategy.access$5(OpenStrategy.java:259)
> at org.eclipse.jface.util.OpenStrategy$1$2.run(OpenStrategy.java:440)
> at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.RunnableLock.run(RunnableLock.java:35)
> at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Synchronizer.runAsyncMessages(Synchronizer.java:135)
> at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runAsyncMessages(Display.java:4155)
> {noformat}
> Bundles:
> | org.eclipse.core.runtime | 3.11.1.v20150903-1804 | 3.11.1.v20150903-1804 |
> | org.eclipse.jface | 3.11.1.v20160128-1644 | 3.11.1.v20160128-1644 |
> | org.eclipse.m2e.core | 1.6.3.20160209-1446 | 1.6.3.20160209-1446 |
> | org.eclipse.osgi | 3.10.102.v20160118-1700 | 3.10.102.v20160118-1700 |
> | org.eclipse.swt | 3.104.2.v20160212-1350 | 3.104.2.v20160212-1350 |
> | org.eclipse.ui | 3.107.0.v20150507-1945 | 3.107.0.v20150507-1945 |
> | org.jboss.tools.arquillian.core | 1.2.1.Final-v20160331-0142-B69 | 1.2.1.Final-v20160331-0142-B69 |
> | org.jboss.tools.arquillian.ui | 1.2.1.Final-v20160331-0142-B69 | 1.2.1.Final-v20160331-0142-B69 |
> Operating Systems:
> | Windows | 10.0.0 | 10.0.0 |
> The above information is a snapshot of the collected data. Visit [this page|https://redhat.ctrlflow.com/reviewers/#!/problems/578edac2e4b072d363...] for the latest data.
> Thank you for your assistance.
> Your friendly error-reports-inbox.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22968) if a build fails to publish, future builds may think there's nothing new and also not publish
by Andre Dietisheim (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Andre Dietisheim commented on JBIDE-22968:
------------------------------------------
p2diff deep comparison is not a binary comparison of the IUs but a "deeper" comparison of the p2 metadata:
https://github.com/irbull/p2diff/blob/master/org.eclipse.equinox.p2.examp...
{code}
/**
* Does a deep compare on two IUs. A deep compare will return differences inside
* two IUs (with the same ID), where the differences are more than just 'version' differences.
*
* For example, assume we have two IUs A and B - Where A and B have the same ID but different versions
* The DeepIUCompare will find the parts of these IUs that differ. However, if a part only differs by a version number,
* that is, for example, if all the requirements are the same but the versions are different, this will not be reported.
*
* This tool allows you to find elements that have been added or removed from an IU.
*
{code}
I dont see any checks on IU hash or size, just deeper inspection of the p2 metadata (properties, requirements, etc.)
> if a build fails to publish, future builds may think there's nothing new and also not publish
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22968
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22968
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Nick Boldt
> Fix For: 4.4.1.AM3
>
> Attachments: openshift-failed-future-builds-did-not-publish.png
>
>
> When publishing snapshots to download.jboss.org via Jenkins jobs, we need to add a check for "did the last build fail? if so, set skipRevisionCheckWhenPublishing = true"
> That way we don't get situations where the Openshift build fails (because failed enforcer check) and then the next 4-5 builds are NOT published (because as far as the current tests are concerned, the latest SHA in Jenkins == latest SHA in github... but NOT the latest SHA on download.jboss.org/.../snapshots/JOB_NAME/latest/.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22999) Red Hat Central Rebranding
by Marián Labuda (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Marián Labuda edited comment on JBIDE-22999 at 8/12/16 11:06 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I like most the light grey version, but it could be more rich. On first sight it looks kinda plain. Maybe also some elements to increase overall contrast would be nice. Maybe few dark red elements...
was (Author: mlabuda):
I like most the light grey version, but it could be more rich. On first sight it looks kinda plain. Maybe also some elements to increase overall contrast would be nice...
> Red Hat Central Rebranding
> --------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22999
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22999
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: central
> Affects Versions: 4.4.1.AM2
> Reporter: Marián Labuda
> Assignee: James Cobb
> Fix For: 4.4.x
>
> Attachments: central-rhd-icon.png, fullIDE.png, tools_rebrand.png, tools_rebrand_r1v2.png, tools_rebrand_r1v3.png
>
>
> Quoting [~james.cobb], from JBIDE-22382
> {quote}
> I've pulled in the branding fro RHD into this IDE panel.
> 1. I've opted to use colors verses an grey monotones
> 2. I've used Red Hat icons from the icon set
> Thoughts?
> {quote}
> !tools_rebrand.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22999) Red Hat Central Rebranding
by Marián Labuda (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Marián Labuda commented on JBIDE-22999:
---------------------------------------
I like most the light grey version, but it could be more rich. On first sight it looks kinda plain. Maybe also some elements to increase overall contrast would be nice...
> Red Hat Central Rebranding
> --------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22999
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22999
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: central
> Affects Versions: 4.4.1.AM2
> Reporter: Marián Labuda
> Assignee: James Cobb
> Fix For: 4.4.x
>
> Attachments: central-rhd-icon.png, fullIDE.png, tools_rebrand.png, tools_rebrand_r1v2.png, tools_rebrand_r1v3.png
>
>
> Quoting [~james.cobb], from JBIDE-22382
> {quote}
> I've pulled in the branding fro RHD into this IDE panel.
> 1. I've opted to use colors verses an grey monotones
> 2. I've used Red Hat icons from the icon set
> Thoughts?
> {quote}
> !tools_rebrand.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22968) if a build fails to publish, future builds may think there's nothing new and also not publish
by Nick Boldt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Nick Boldt commented on JBIDE-22968:
------------------------------------
A better p2diff check we should use:
{code}
p2diff -mode=deep http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/neon/snapshots/builds/jbosstools-ope... \
file://`pwd` \
| egrep -v "\.feature.jar|\.source|Update Site" | egrep "^(<|>) " | sed -e "s/\(<\|>\) \(.\+\)/\2\1/" | sort | sed -e "s/\(.\+\) \(<\|>\)/\2 \1/" | egrep "^(<|>)"
{code}
This will enable deep mode, to compare IU contents instead of just looking at filenames. So instead of finding 10 IUs different in openshift (client plugin + 2 containing features + 2 containing feature.groups + sources), we only find that the client plugin (and its source plugin) have changed. Much cleaner output, especially if we filter out the source plugin and only see the changed client plugin:
{code}
< org.jboss.tools.openshift.client [3.3.0.AM3-v20160812-0237-B1502]
> org.jboss.tools.openshift.client [3.3.0.AM3-v20160812-1420]
{code}
So, next week can see if we can go back to using the jgit timestamp provider for this plugin, and have p2diff detect the changes in its lib/ folder when SNAPSHOT deps change.
> if a build fails to publish, future builds may think there's nothing new and also not publish
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22968
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22968
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
> Reporter: Nick Boldt
> Assignee: Nick Boldt
> Fix For: 4.4.1.AM3
>
> Attachments: openshift-failed-future-builds-did-not-publish.png
>
>
> When publishing snapshots to download.jboss.org via Jenkins jobs, we need to add a check for "did the last build fail? if so, set skipRevisionCheckWhenPublishing = true"
> That way we don't get situations where the Openshift build fails (because failed enforcer check) and then the next 4-5 builds are NOT published (because as far as the current tests are concerned, the latest SHA in Jenkins == latest SHA in github... but NOT the latest SHA on download.jboss.org/.../snapshots/JOB_NAME/latest/.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22999) Red Hat Central Rebranding
by Fred Bricon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Fred Bricon edited comment on JBIDE-22999 at 8/12/16 11:02 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
[~fbricon] I've worked up two more versions to address the concerns.
r1v2:
Removes the bolder red colors and uses are pale orange/yellow that works with the RHD color palette.
!tools_rebrand_r1v2.png!
r1v3:
Uses lighter greys to keep the overall feel softer to blend in more with the rest of the IDE interface (also uses a more RHD friendly orange/yellow).
!tools_rebrand_r1v3.png!
was (Author: james.cobb):
[~fbricon] I've worked up two more versions to address the concerns.
r1v2:
Removes the bolder red colors and uses are pale orange/yellow that works with the RHD color palette.
r1v3:
Uses lighter greys to keep the overall feel softer to blend in more with the rest of the IDE interface (also uses a more RHD friendly orange/yellow).
> Red Hat Central Rebranding
> --------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22999
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22999
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: central
> Affects Versions: 4.4.1.AM2
> Reporter: Marián Labuda
> Assignee: James Cobb
> Fix For: 4.4.x
>
> Attachments: central-rhd-icon.png, fullIDE.png, tools_rebrand.png, tools_rebrand_r1v2.png, tools_rebrand_r1v3.png
>
>
> Quoting [~james.cobb], from JBIDE-22382
> {quote}
> I've pulled in the branding fro RHD into this IDE panel.
> 1. I've opted to use colors verses an grey monotones
> 2. I've used Red Hat icons from the icon set
> Thoughts?
> {quote}
> !tools_rebrand.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22999) Red Hat Central Rebranding
by Fred Bricon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Fred Bricon commented on JBIDE-22999:
-------------------------------------
on the other hand, having a dark and a light version of central would help with dark theme support (JBIDE-20045)
> Red Hat Central Rebranding
> --------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22999
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22999
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: central
> Affects Versions: 4.4.1.AM2
> Reporter: Marián Labuda
> Assignee: James Cobb
> Fix For: 4.4.x
>
> Attachments: central-rhd-icon.png, fullIDE.png, tools_rebrand.png, tools_rebrand_r1v2.png, tools_rebrand_r1v3.png
>
>
> Quoting [~james.cobb], from JBIDE-22382
> {quote}
> I've pulled in the branding fro RHD into this IDE panel.
> 1. I've opted to use colors verses an grey monotones
> 2. I've used Red Hat icons from the icon set
> Thoughts?
> {quote}
> !tools_rebrand.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBIDE-22999) Red Hat Central Rebranding
by Fred Bricon (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Fred Bricon commented on JBIDE-22999:
-------------------------------------
I prefer the lighter grey version, as it's way softer on the eyes, but it also makes it look pretty depressing
> Red Hat Central Rebranding
> --------------------------
>
> Key: JBIDE-22999
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-22999
> Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: central
> Affects Versions: 4.4.1.AM2
> Reporter: Marián Labuda
> Assignee: James Cobb
> Fix For: 4.4.x
>
> Attachments: central-rhd-icon.png, fullIDE.png, tools_rebrand.png, tools_rebrand_r1v2.png, tools_rebrand_r1v3.png
>
>
> Quoting [~james.cobb], from JBIDE-22382
> {quote}
> I've pulled in the branding fro RHD into this IDE panel.
> 1. I've opted to use colors verses an grey monotones
> 2. I've used Red Hat icons from the icon set
> Thoughts?
> {quote}
> !tools_rebrand.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 8 months