[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-12631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi...
]
Koen Aers commented on JBIDE-12631:
-----------------------------------
Nick,
I don't know the actual status of this but 'flow' was created to catch all the
commonalities between the jpdl 4, seam flow and rule flow editors. I'm pretty sure
that rule flow has never used it but jpdl 4 and seam flow were both using it.
merge Flow component into jBPM3 component in SVN? Or remove it
entirely?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-12631
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-12631
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Bug
Components: jbpm
Affects Versions: 3.3.0.Final-SOA
Reporter: Nick Boldt
Assignee: Koen Aers
Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha1-SOA
Koen:
Is there any reason to keep the Flow component separated from the jbpm3/4 component in
SVN?
If we merge them we can build them in ONE step instead of TWO, saving time and
resources.
Actually, is Flow even still needed? Or was that a sidetrack for jbpm4 only, and thus can
be deprecated/removed?
My feeling is that we can purge everything in Flow and all the jbpm4 stuff from SVN,
leaving only these IUs:
{code}
org.jbpm.gd.jpdl.feature
org.jboss.tools.jbpm3.feature
org.jboss.tools.jbpm3.test.feature
org.jboss.tools.jbpm.convert.feature
org.jboss.tools.jbpm.common.feature
org.jboss.tools.jbpm.common
org.jboss.tools.jbpm.convert
org.jbpm.gd.jpdl
org.jboss.tools.jbpm.common.test
org.jboss.tools.jbpm.convert.test
org.jbpm.gd.jpdl.test
org.jboss.tools.jbpm.ui.bot.test
{code}
Is that correct?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira