[jbosstools-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBIDE-5840) Modeshape should use the existing publishing framework and server view
[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-5840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu...
]
John Verhaeg commented on JBIDE-5840:
-------------------------------------
The association with a ModeShape server is determined on a file-by-file basis, so is once
again more similar to the SVN paradigm. In fact, each file can be associated with
multiple ModeShape servers. However, publishing to ModeShape is not necessarily a
team-related activity either, and is more about dissecting the metadata within models to
analyze relationships, report on lineage, etc. Given this understanding, I think the WTP
issue is moot.
Barry and I are both committers in the ModeShape project, but no one from the ModeShape
project (including us) will be at EclipseCon that I'm aware.
Modeshape should use the existing publishing framework and server
view
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-5840
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-5840
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: modeshape
Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen
Priority: Critical
Fix For: LATER
Were reading the docs in modeshape plugin and screenshots (couldn't get it to run
outofbox - probably some misconfig in my eclipse)
and noted that this seem to be duplicating both resource filtering, deployment, console
and server views for the modeshape repositiories.
That sounds/feels very redundant.
Why not create a WTP Server which can deploy these things instead of a complete separate
and duplicate functionality ?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira