Hi Burr,
do I need to register here
http://www.info.redhat.com/forms/20080417DevelopersSOAwebcast
or is there a short cut for internal folks?
cheers
-thomas
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"richard.opalka(a)jboss.com" wrote : "heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote : I am looking for a smart way to hook into that without having to migrate our build completely.
| I agree. We have to deal with the integration issue. I would do it in the way we do it now in our spy, just release it to local maven repository and force developer to commit it there manually ;)
Just wanted to add that this is currently the only way to deploy to the maven releases repository (i.e. deploy locally and then commit to svn).
This page has some information about how to commit to the maven repository (http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=MavenReleaseRepository)
Please use the maven deploy plugin or the ant tasks when deploying to the repository, so that the correct metadata is generated.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141468#4141468
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141468
"heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote : If maven will oppose so many problem it will render itself useless anyway.
Yes, let's let it to stay the test of time ;)
"heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote : I am looking for a smart way to hook into that without having to migrate our build completely.
I agree. We have to deal with the integration issue. I would do it in the way we do it now in our spy, just release it to local maven repository and force developer to commit it there manually ;)
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141258#4141258
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141258
"heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote : This leads to the question if we want to migrate the build to maven or simply add maven release capabilities to it, which is probably easier but may cause issue in the long run, when more and more project migrate. Maybe there is a partly solution? Like brining in Ivy for dependency management? Basically I see the only benefit I see is leveraging maven repositories. We need to be able to publish to and retrieve from a maven repository.
I'm not a Maven fan and I don't believe in Maven + AS future, see:
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141238#4141238
So I'm saying don't migrate to maven builds instead of ant builds.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141249#4141249
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141249
This leads to the question if we want to migrate the build to maven or simply add maven release capabilities to it, which is probably easier but may cause issue in the long run, when more and more project migrate. Maybe there is a partly solution? Like brining in Ivy for dependency management? Basically I see the only benefit in leveraging maven repositories. We need to be able to publish to and retrieve from a maven repository.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141241#4141241
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4141241
I've tested the scenario with both Metro and Native. I had to put the XmlSeeAlso annotation manually (tooling issue):
@XmlSeeAlso(USAddressType.class)
public class AddressResponse {
...
}
Both Native and Metro handle request and response in the same way.
They receive a USAddress instance (requires casting though) and respond with a correct xsd:type attribute on the AddressResponse super element.
IMO, everything is fine and works as expected, besides the tooling problem.
But that's something we cannot easily fix without going to JAXWS 2.1.
Here's is a quick oveview how JAXB handles xsd:any types:
https://jaxb.dev.java.net/guide/Mapping_of__xs_any___.html
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4140546#4140546
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4140546