April 2008 - jbossws-dev - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Jira and multiple fix versions

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, I propose when we work with Jira we only ever assign an issue to a single "fix version" Issues that apply to multiple stacks should be assigned to cxf/metro but not to native In that way, our workload estimates become more meaningful (because jira only counts the estimate once) and we have better control over our overall workload distribution metro: 50% cxf: 30% native: 20% View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143429#4143429 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143429

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

Clean codebase at jira freeze

by Thomas Diesler

Folks, I am happy to tell you that we have no hudson test failures at 3.0.2 jira freeze http://jbws.dyndns.org:8180/hudson/ In our our typical redhat style I like to thank everybody who made this possible ;-) cheers -thomas -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler Web Service Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

16 years, 9 months

2
2
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Dropping the version suffix

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

"thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : An issue can actually have multiple fix versions too. Yes, I used this approach when I was doing the last release :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143385#4143385 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143385

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Dropping the version suffix

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

An issue can actually have multiple fix versions too. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143379#4143379 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143379

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Dropping the version suffix

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

"thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : This however means, that in JIRA we have to move the jbossws-3.0.2 issues to a particular stack. That's ok isn't it? Yes, that's OK for me too. Particular issue can belong to multiple components (in our case stacks) ;) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143375#4143375 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143375

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Dropping the version suffix

by richard.opalka＠jboss.com

I'm fine with suggested versioning scheme too ;) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143374#4143374 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143374

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Dropping the version suffix

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

This however means, that in JIRA we have to move the jbossws-3.0.2 issues to a particular stack. That's ok isn't it? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143371#4143371 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143371

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Dropping the version suffix

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

Yes, good idea. The versioning scheme we currently use is really confusing. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143368#4143368 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143368

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Dropping the version suffix

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, how about having just jbossws-3.0.2-native jbossws-3.0.2-cxf jbossws-3.0.2-metro Since we have the jbossws version (i.e. 3.0.2) in the version id for every stack, the stack specific suffixes don't seem to add relevant information View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143366#4143366 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143366

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: Invocation exception handling

by nhe

Hi, I have, as a workaround, in InvokerEJB3.handleException wrapped checked exceptions into InvocationTargetExceptions. Maybe a solution would be to change the InvocationHandler to first unwrap the MBeanException and then wrap it into a InvocationTargetException. /Niklas View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4143130#4143130 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4143130

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jbossws-dev April 2008