Re: [jbossws-dev] To SH or not to SH

Ant and countless other software uses .sh as well. When you see the .sh extension you immediately knows what the contents of the file are. The same does not apply to a file without extension. I'd go for keeping .sh. -Alejandro Jason T. Greene wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > I was planning on dropping the sh extension for JAX-WS tools. The reason > is so that the same command works for all platforms. This works since on > windows you don't need to type the .bat extension to execute the script. > However everything else in jboss uses .sh, and the old tools use .sh. So > perhaps it's bad to break convention. > > How do you want to do this? > > -Jason > > _______________________________________________ > jbossws-dev mailing list > jbossws-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev