Re: [jbossws-dev] To SH or not to SH

Ok I am mostly convinced, although ant doesn't use ".sh" On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 23:32 -0600, Alejandro Guízar wrote: > Ant and countless other software uses .sh as well. When you see the .sh > extension you immediately knows what the contents of the file are. The > same does not apply to a file without extension. > > I'd go for keeping .sh. > > -Alejandro > > Jason T. Greene wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > I was planning on dropping the sh extension for JAX-WS tools. The reason > > is so that the same command works for all platforms. This works since on > > windows you don't need to type the .bat extension to execute the script. > > However everything else in jboss uses .sh, and the old tools use .sh. So > > perhaps it's bad to break convention. > > > > How do you want to do this? > > > > -Jason > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jbossws-dev mailing list > > jbossws-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev _______________________________________________ jbossws-dev mailing list jbossws-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev