Gang -
Both MyFaces and Mojarra currently assume/require the file extension
".xhtml" for composite component resources. This seems overly
restrictive. Composite component authors should be able to use other
file extensions - eg. ".view.xml", or, as we would like to do here:
".jsf".
What do folks think about introducing spec language that requires the
JSF implementations to check for composite component resources under any
extensions specified via the "javax.faces.FACELETS_VIEW_MAPPINGS"
context parameter?
Or, if we start looking into jar-specific configuration, it might be
interesting to allow such extensions to be specified on a per-resource
library basis.
Thoughts?
Andy